UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
——————————————
FORM 8-K
——————————————
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): June 6, 2023
——————————————
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
——————————————
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||||||||||||
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212 ) 433-3791
(Registrant’s telephone number, include area code)
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
——————————————
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
| Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) | |||||
| Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) | |||||
| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) | |||||
| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) | |||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
On June 6, 2023, Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) issued the press release furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K (this “Current Report”) and incorporated herein by reference. In addition, beginning on June 6, 2023, spokespersons for the Company plan to present the information in the Corporate Presentation and Investor Presentation furnished as Exhibits 99.2 and 99.3, respectively, to this Current Report and each incorporated herein by reference at conferences and in meetings with investors and analysts.
The information contained in Item 7.01 of this Current Report (including Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3 attached hereto) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, except as expressly provided by specific reference in such a filing.
Item 8.01 Other Events.
On June 6, 2023, the Company announced the monotherapy recommended Phase 2 dose (“RP2D”) for azenosertib, the Company’s potentially first-in-class WEE1 inhibitor. Based on encouraging Phase 1 dose optimization clinical data, the RP2D for azenosertib as a monotherapy is 400 mg daily (“QD”) on a five days on, two days off (“5:2”) weekly administration schedule.
As of April 24, 2023, a total of 127 heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with monotherapy azenosertib at doses ≥ 300 mg at either continuous daily dosing or intermittent weekly administration schedules. Across all tumor types, 74 patients were treated with continuous dosing schedules and 53 patients were treated with intermittent dosing schedules.
•As of June 2, 2023, the confirmed objective response rate (“ORR”) was 36.8% (7/19) in the combined ovarian cancer and uterine serous carcinoma (“USC”) subgroups who received an intermittent dosing schedule, versus 19.2% (5/26) in those who received a continuous dosing schedule.
•Steady state exposure, as measured by AUC0-24, more than doubled at the new intermittent RP2D, compared to AUC observed at 300 mg QD with continuous administration.
•Intermittent dosing maintained azenosertib safety and improved tolerability as compared to continuous dosing. Gastrointestinal, fatigue, and hematologic Grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events (“TRAEs”) were comparable or favorable versus continuous dosing. No discontinuations due to TRAEs were observed in the intermittent cohorts.
The Company is currently enrolling patients at the new RP2D in three ongoing Phase 2 trials evaluating monotherapy azenosertib in the following patient populations:
•Cyclin E1+, platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer;
•USC; and
•PARP inhibitor-resistant and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (new cohort of ongoing study).
The Company plans to update efficacy data from its Phase 1 monotherapy dose optimization study and provide program timeline updates for these three azenosertib Phase 2 monotherapy trials currently enrolling patients at the RP2D in the second half of 2023. In addition, the Company believes azenosertib has potential applicability in a broad array of tumor types, including non-gynecological malignancies.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this Current Report regarding the Company's strategy, plans, prospects, expectations, beliefs, intentions and goals are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, including, but not limited to, statements regarding the Company’s plan to provide clinical data and program timeline updates, and the timing thereof; the potential for azenosertib to be first-in-class; the Company's plans to enroll patients in ongoing Phase 2 trials; and the potential applicability of azenosertib in a broad array of tumor types, including non-gynecological malignancies. The terms “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “potential,” “will” and similar references are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all
forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following: the Company’s limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate the Company’s current business and predict the Company’s future success and viability; the Company has and expects to continue to incur significant losses; the Company’s need for additional funding, which may not be available; the Company’s plans, including the costs thereof, of development of any companion diagnostics; the Company’s substantial dependence on the success of its lead product candidates; the outcome of preclinical testing and early trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials; failure to identify additional product candidates and develop or commercialize marketable products; potential unforeseen events during clinical trials could cause delays or other adverse consequences; risks relating to the regulatory approval process or ongoing regulatory obligations; failure to obtain U.S. or international marketing approval; the Company’s product candidates may cause serious adverse side effects; inability to maintain collaborations, or the failure of these collaborations; the Company’s reliance on third parties; effects of significant competition; the possibility of system failures or security breaches; risks relating to intellectual property; the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, and risks relating to management transitions; significant costs as a result of operating as a public company; and the other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s most recently filed periodic report on Form 10-K or 10-Q and subsequent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Company’s other filings with the SEC. These forward-looking statements (except as otherwise noted) speak only as of the date of this Current Report, and the Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims, any obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in this Current Report.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits
The following Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3 relating to Item 7.01 shall be deemed to be furnished, and not filed:
ExhibitNo. | Description | |||||||
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the inline XBRL document) | |||||||
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| ZENTALIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. | ||||||||||||||
| Date: June 6, 2023 | By: | /s/ Melissa Epperly | ||||||||||||
| Melissa Epperly | ||||||||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||
Exhibit 99.1
Zentalis Announces Intermittent Azenosertib Monotherapy Dosing Nearly Doubles Efficacy Over Continuous Dosing
ORR of 36.8% in heavily pretreated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and USC patients treated with intermittent dosing
Establishes monotherapy RP2D of 400 mg QD with 5:2 dosing schedule; New RP2D more than doubles exposure levels, maintains safety and improves tolerability with no treatment-related discontinuations
Company plans to update efficacy data from Phase 1 monotherapy dose optimization study and provide program timeline updates for three azenosertib Phase 2 monotherapy trials currently enrolling patients at the RP2D in the second half of 2023
Investor call at 8:00 a.m. ET today to review azenosertib monotherapy data supporting dose selection and chemotherapy combination data presented at ASCO
NEW YORK & SAN DIEGO, June 6, 2023 – Zentalis® Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: ZNTL), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company discovering and developing clinically differentiated small molecule therapeutics targeting fundamental biological pathways of cancers, today announced the monotherapy recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for azenosertib, the Company's potentially first-in-class WEE1 inhibitor. Based on encouraging Phase 1 dose optimization clinical data, the RP2D for azenosertib as a monotherapy is 400 mg daily (QD) on a 5 days on, 2 days off (5:2) weekly administration schedule. This intermittent dosing schedule more than doubled steady state drug exposure in comparison to continuous dosing, and achieved promising efficacy signals, while maintaining safety and improving tolerability.
"With this new optimized monotherapy dosing schedule for azenosertib, we believe we have unlocked the therapeutic potential of WEE1 inhibition, achieving monotherapy activity levels few oncology agents have been able to attain,” said Kimberly Blackwell, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of Zentalis. “Having demonstrated favorable anti-tumor activity as both a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, we are confident azenosertib has tremendous promise to help patients with difficult-to-treat cancers. With our focus on platinum-resistant ovarian cancer for azenosertib as a monotherapy and platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer for azenosertib in chemotherapy combinations, we have the potential to address the majority of ovarian cancer patients. We are committed to rapidly advancing our azenosertib clinical strategy, concentrating on the fastest paths to market to reach patients in need.”
Summary of Phase 1 Monotherapy Dose Optimization Data:
As of April 24, 2023, a total of 127 heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with monotherapy azenosertib at doses ≥ 300 mg at either continuous daily dosing or intermittent weekly administration schedules. Across all tumor types, 74 patients were treated with continuous dosing schedules and 53 patients were treated with intermittent dosing schedules.
•The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 36.8% (7/19) in the combined ovarian cancer and uterine serous carcinoma (USC) subgroups who received an intermittent dosing schedule, versus 19.2% (5/26) in those who received a continuous dosing schedule.
•Steady state exposure, as measured by AUC0-24, more than doubled at the new intermittent RP2D, compared to AUC observed at 300 mg QD with continuous administration.
•Intermittent dosing maintained azenosertib safety and improved tolerability as compared to continuous dosing. Gastrointestinal, fatigue, and hematologic Grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were comparable or favorable versus continuous dosing. No discontinuations due to TRAEs were observed in the intermittent cohorts.
•The Company is currently enrolling patients at the new RP2D in three ongoing Phase 2 trials evaluating monotherapy azenosertib in the following patient populations:
oCyclin E1+, platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer
oUSC
oPARP inhibitor-resistant and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (new cohort of ongoing study)
“WEE1 inhibition by monotherapy azenosertib has the potential to address the significant unmet need in ovarian cancer and uterine serous carcinoma, where patients often have limited treatment options,” said Funda Meric-Bernstam, M.D., Chair of the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics -- the Phase 1 Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and a member of the Zentalis Scientific Advisory Board. “Today’s data supporting the newly established monotherapy dose – which demonstrates promising efficacy and improved tolerability – coupled with data supporting the combination of azenosertib with chemotherapy, suggest that this promising molecule has potential to be a highly effective therapeutic tool to fight difficult-to-treat cancers.”
Dr. Blackwell added, “These data sets underpin our broader strategy to expand options for patients in a broad array of tumor types.”
Conference Call
The Company will host a webcast today at 8:00 a.m. ET to review the azenosertib Phase 1 monotherapy data supporting dose selection, as well as the positive azenosertib plus chemotherapy Phase 1b combination data presented at the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting. The webcast will be accessible via the Investors page of Zentalis’ website, www.zentalis.com. The archived webcast and presentation will be available on the Company’s website after the event.
About Azenosertib
Azenosertib is a potentially first-in-class and best-in-class small molecule WEE1 inhibitor in development for the treatment of cancer. Inhibition of WEE1, a DNA damage response kinase, drives cancer cells into mitosis without being able to repair damaged DNA, resulting in cell death. Currently, there are no FDA-approved WEE1 inhibitors, and azenosertib has been designed for superior selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties. Azenosertib is being developed in therapeutic areas of high unmet need and is being evaluated as a monotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy, and in combination with molecularly targeted agents.
About Zentalis Pharmaceuticals
Zentalis® Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company discovering and developing small molecule therapeutics targeting fundamental biological pathways of cancers. Utilizing its Integrated Discovery Engine, the Company is developing a focused pipeline of potentially best-in-class oncology candidates, which include azenosertib (ZN-c3), a WEE1 inhibitor for advanced solid tumors, ZN-d5, a BCL-2 inhibitor for hematologic malignancies and related disorders, and a heterobifunctional degrader of BCL-xL for solid and hematological malignancies. The Company is also leveraging its
extensive experience and capabilities across cancer biology and medicinal chemistry to advance its research on protein degraders. Zentalis has operations in both New York and San Diego.
For more information, please visit www.zentalis.com. Follow Zentalis on Twitter at @ZentalisP and on LinkedIn at www.linkedin.com/company/zentalis-pharmaceuticals.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our plans to provide clinical data and program timeline updates, and the timing thereof; the potential for azenosertib to be first-in-class and best-in-class; the potential benefits of azenosertib; our belief that we have unlocked the therapeutic potential of WEE1 inhibition; our belief and confidence that azenosertib has tremendous promise to help patients with difficult-to-treat cancer; the potential addressable patient population of azenosertib, including the ovarian cancer patient population; our plans to rapidly advance our azenosertib clinical and regulatory strategy; the potential for azenosertib to address significant unmet need in ovarian cancer and USC; the potential for azenosertib to be a highly effective therapeutic tool to fight difficult-to-treat cancers; our broader strategy to expand options for patients in a broad array of tumor types; the potential benefits of the design of azenosertib; and the potential for our product candidates to be best-in-class. The terms “believe,” “committed,” “confident,” “design,” “encouraging,” “plan,” “potential,” “promising,” “strategy,” “suggest,” “to be,” “will,” and similar references are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following: our limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate our current business and predict our future success and viability; we have and expect to continue to incur significant losses; our need for additional funding, which may not be available; our plans, including the costs thereof, of development of any diagnostic tools; the outcome of preclinical testing and early trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials; failure to identify additional product candidates and develop or commercialize marketable products; potential unforeseen events during clinical trials could cause delays or other adverse consequences; risks relating to the regulatory approval process or ongoing regulatory obligations; failure to obtain U.S. or international marketing approval; our product candidates may cause serious adverse side effects; inability to maintain our collaborations, or the failure of these collaborations; our reliance on third parties; effects of significant competition; the possibility of system failures or security breaches; risks relating to intellectual property; our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, and risks relating to management transitions; significant costs as a result of operating as a public company; and the other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our most recently filed periodic report on Form 10-K or 10-Q and subsequent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and our other filings with the SEC. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this press release. While we may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we disclaim any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause our views to change.
ZENTALIS® and its associated logos are trademarks of Zentalis and/or its affiliates. All website addresses and other links in this press release are for information only and are not intended to be an active link or to incorporate any website or other information into this press release.
Investor Contacts:
Adam D. Levy, PhD, MBA
alevy@zentalis.com
Emily White
Solebury Strategic Communications
ewhite@soleburystrat.com
Media Contact:
Danielle Cantey
Evoke Canale
danielle.cantey@evokegroup.com
(619) 826 4657
Corporate Presentation June 2023 Nasdaq: ZNTL
2 Forward Looking Statement and Disclaimer Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Zentalis” or the “Company”) cautions that this presentation (including oral commentary that accompanies this presentation) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this presentation that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including without limitation statements regarding potential for our product candidates to be first-in-class and/or best-in-class; potential for accelerated approval paths; potential for our product candidates to be developed as monotherapies and in combination; potential for azenosertib (ZN-c3) to address large unmet need across an array of cancers; potential benefits of intermittent dosing for our product candidates; our development approach for our product candidates, including azenosertib and ZN-d5; plans for and potential benefits of dose optimization, and the anticipated timing of updates on dosing optimization, including timing of declaring a monotherapy RP2D for ZN-d5; timing of providing updates on azenosertib program timelines and potential paths to registration; timing of preclinical and clinical program updates; the potential unmet need in a particular indication and/or patient population; potential for combinations including our product candidates and the potential benefits thereof; the target profiles and potential benefits of our product candidates and their mechanisms of action, including as a monotherapy and/or in combination; our belief that we have strengthened our clinical development plans, including for azenosertib; clinical and regulatory progress of our product candidates, including the estimated timing of IND-enabling studies, enrollment, initiation of clinical trials and data announcements; the market opportunities for and market potential of our product candidates; timing of initiating Phase 3 trial of azenosertib in combination with chemotherapy in Cyclin E1+ platinum sensitive ovarian cancer; timing of advancement of our preclinical programs, including BCL-xL and protein degrader programs; our anticipated milestones, as well as statements that include the words “continue,” “design,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “milestone,” “opportunity,” “plan,” “potential,” “predicts,” “strategy,” “will” and similar statements of a future or forward- looking nature. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following: our limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate our current business and predict our future success and viability; we have and expect to continue to incur significant losses; our need for additional funding, which may not be available; our plans, including the costs thereof, of development of any diagnostic tools; the outcome of preclinical testing and early trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials; failure to identify additional product candidates and develop or commercialize marketable products; potential unforeseen events during clinical trials could cause delays or other adverse consequences; risks relating to the regulatory approval process or ongoing regulatory obligations; failure to obtain U.S. or international marketing approval; our product candidates may cause serious adverse side effects; inability to maintain our collaborations, or the failure of these collaborations; our reliance on third parties; effects of significant competition; the possibility of system failures or security breaches; risks relating to intellectual property; our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, and risks relating to management transitions; and significant costs as a result of operating as a public company. Other risks and uncertainties include those identified under the caption “Risk Factors” in our most recently filed periodic reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q and subsequent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in the future could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this presentation. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this presentation. New risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict all risks and uncertainties. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements except to the extent required by applicable law. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. No representations or warranties (expressed or implied) are made about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements. This presentation also contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and other data about our industry. These data involve a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such data and estimates. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the markets in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk. Neither we nor our affiliates, advisors or representatives makes any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of that data or undertake to update such data after the date of this presentation. ZENTALIS® and its associated logos are trademarks of Zentalis and/or its affiliates. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks appearing in this presentation are the property of their respective owners. All website addresses given in this presentation are for information only and are not intended to be an active link or to incorporate any website information into this document. Zentalis’ product candidates are investigational drugs and have not yet been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or any other regulatory authority.
3 • Deep oncology experience • Veteran scientific, clinical advisors • Partnerships with Pfizer, GSK Positioned to Execute and Deliver We Are a Clinical-Stage Oncology Company Focused on Difficult-to-Treat Cancers • High levels of monotherapy anti-tumor activity • Best-in-class safety and tolerability to date supports use in earlier lines and maintenance settings • Demonstrated synergistic activity with chemotherapy and molecularly targeted agents • Enriched activity in tumors with high genomic instability including Cyclin E1+ and HRD+ cancers • 8 trials; large indications; 400+ patients dosed Ac ce le ra tin g De ve lo pm en t Bl oc kb us te r C om m er ci al O pp or tu ni ty • Direct registrational path with multiple shots on goal across monotherapy and chemotherapy combination • Potential to cover 88% of ovarian cancer across multiple lines of therapy ─ Represents treatable population of ~56K patients / year • Potential to expand to broad set of tumors as monotherapy or in combination, addressing ~140K per year • Global commercial rights (ex-China) • IP – U.S. composition of matter 2039 Azenosertib: First-in-Class WEE1i Candidate with Broad Franchise Potential • Multiple indications; Best-in-class potential in heme malignancies • 100+ patients dosed across 3 ongoing studies • Positioned to potentially demonstrate monotherapy activity in AL amyloidosis • Attractive commercial opportunity as potential first registered drug in AL amyloidosis Highly Selective BCL-2 Inhibitor • Discovering assets leveraging distinctive chemistry expertise Promising Preclinical Programs
4 Pipeline Addresses Difficult to Treat Cancers with Large Commercial Opportunities COMPOUND INDICATION + DEVELOPMENT APPROACH PRECLINICAL Phase 1 Phase 1b Phase 2 Phase 3 STATUS / EXPECTED MILESTONES Azenosertib WEE1 Inhibitor Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer + Paclitaxel or Carboplatin Initiate Q1 2024 Cyclin E1 Positive Ovarian Cancer Monotherapy Enrolling Uterine Serous Carcinoma Monotherapy Enrolling; FDA Fast Track Designation PARP Resistant Ovarian Cancer Azenosertib monotherapy, alternating with niraparib or concurrent with niraparib Enrolling Dose Optimization in Solid Tumors Monotherapy Enrolling Osteosarcoma + gemcitabine Enrolling BRAF Mutant Colorectal Cancer + encorafenib and cetuximab Enrolling Pancreatic Cancer + gemcitabine Dana Farber Cancer Institute, funded by SU2C/Lustgarten ZN-d5 BCL-2 Inhibitor Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis Monotherapy Enrolling; Provide interim clinical data and declare RP2D for monotherapy 2H23 Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL) Monotherapy Enrolling Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) + azenosertib Enrolling; Provide preliminary data from clinical trial 2H23 BCL-xL Degrader Solid Tumors and Heme Malignancies Declared development candidate; IND enabling activities initiated
Azenosertib WEE1 Inhibitor with Potential to Address Large Unmet Need Across Array of Cancers
6 Three ongoing Phase 2 monotherapy trials have the potential to support rapid paths to registration in ovarian cancer and USC Monotherapy RP2D established: 400 mg 5:2 Doubled steady state drug exposure compared to continuous dosing 37% Objective Response Rate with durable responses using intermittent dosing in ovarian and USC patients No treatment-related discontinuations in patients who were administered intermittent dosing Maintained safety and improves tolerability compared to continuous dosing Azenosertib Monotherapy Dose Optimization Supports Advancement into Multiple Difficult-to-Treat Tumor Types Abbreviations: RP2D: recommended phase 2 dose; 5:2 refers to administration schedule of five days on therapy and two days off; USC, uterine serous carcinoma
7 • WEE1 phosphorylates CDK/Cyclin complexes to engage cell cycle checkpoints, allowing DNA repair to occur • Azenosertib inhibits WEE1: • Leads to inactivation of CDK 1 and 2 • Removes 2 cell cycle checkpoints: G1/S and G2/M • Cell cycle progresses without sufficient DNA repair • Cancer cells accumulate DNA damage, resulting in apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe CDK2/Cyclin E PhosphorylationP WEE1 P P P S G2 M G1 Cell survival Cancer progression P Azenosertib WEE1 CDK2/Cyclin E Cell death S G2 M G1 WEE1 activity in untreated cancer cell Azenosertib blocks WEE1 resulting in cancer cell death Azenosertib Targets WEE1, a Critical Protein for Cancer Cell Survival CDK1/Cyclin A CDK1/Cyclin A Luserna di Rora, et al. 2020. J Hem Onc. 13:126. Elbaek et al. 2022. Cell Reports. 38:110261. Abbreviation: MOA, mechanism of action Establishing RP2D is significant milestone in path to drugging this high-potential oncology target Azenosertib’s MOA and early monotherapy clinical activity made dose optimization critical
8 Cyclin E1 0 0.1 0.3 1 µM Azenosertib p-CHK1 Cleaved Caspase-3 γH2AX p-H3 Azenosertib induces markers of DNA damage, replicative stress, and apoptosis* *OVCAR3 Cyclin E1 positive cells, 16-hour treatment High genomic instability can be caused by: Cyclin E1+ Tumors • Cyclin E1+ drives accelerated entry into S-phase through its partnership with CDK2 • Replication machinery is overloaded, resulting in genomic instability Homologous Recombination Repair Defective (HRD+) Tumors • Results in genomic instability through tumors inability to repair double stranded DNA breaks. Tumors with High Genomic Instability are Sensitive to Azenosertib Monotherapy Dose and Biomarker Enrichment Is Foundational To Our Clinical Strategy
9 Potential to Transform Treatment Paradigm for Patients and Capture Significant Market Share in Ovarian Cancer Cyclin E1+ HRP Cyclin E1+ HRD Cyclin E1 low HRDOthers 30% 24% 12% 34% High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patient Segments • Ongoing clinical programs address Cyclin E1+ and HRD+ patient populations • Opportunity is much larger than recently approved therapies • Data support potential role for azenosertib at every stage of metastatic therapy: • Platinum sensitive: combination with chemotherapy • Platinum resistant: monotherapy and combination with chemotherapy Potential to transform standard of care Azenosertib Monotherapy Potentially Addresses 88% Of High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Sources: 1. HRD prevalence derived from Konstantinopoulos, et al Cancer Discov (2015) 2. CCNE1 amplification prevalence of ~20% reported in Aziz et al Gynecol Oncol (2018) and TGCA Network Nature volume 474 (2011) 3. Cyclin E1 expression and copy number extracted from the digital analysis of Aziz et al Figure 3B to infer full distribution of Cyclin E1 H-scores and overlap with CCNE1 amplification based on Cyclin E1 high definition of H-score >50 4. HRD prevalence and proportion of overlap with CCNE1 amplification from Konstantinopoulos et al, Figure 2 5. Total HGSOC incidence estimates (US, EU5) sourced from SEER and ECIS are 35, 388 individuals/year HRD: Homologous recombination deficient HRP: Homologous recombination proficient
10 Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC 2L+ USC 2L+ USC 2L+ USC 2L+ USC 2L+ USC 2L Pt. Sensitive, HGSOC 2L Pt. Sensitive, HGSOC 2L Pt. Sensitive, HGSOC 2L Pt. Sensitive, HGSOC 1L+ bRAF CRC 1L+ bRAF CRC 1L+ bRAF CRC HRD+ post-PARPi HRD+ post-PARPi Other Cyclin E+ Tumor Types 38,214 42,077 57,807 77,093 89,027 140,950 Po te nt ia l U S + EU 5 Pa tie nt s Gynecologic malignancies Non-Gynecologic malignancies Legend Azenosertib monotherpy Azenosertib + chemotherapy Azenosertib + BEACON Indications Over Time Addressable Patient Population More than Doubles as Franchise Expands to Non- Gynecological Malignancies Source: Used ‘drug-treatable’ estimates from DRG Clarivate for all Ovarian, USC, CRC, Breast, Prostate and Pancreatic. For ‘Other Cyclin-E1 driven solid tumors’ used incidence reported by SEER and ECIS. Cyclin E1 prevalence in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer derived from Petersen, et al CCNE1 and BRD4 co-amplification in high-grade serous ovarian cancer is associated with poor clinical outcomes, Gynecologic Oncology,Volume 157, Issue 2, 2020 Abbreviations: bRAF+ CRC: bRAF mutant Colorectal Cancer; HRD+ : Homologous Recombinant Repair Deficiency; HGSOC: High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer; 2L: Second Line HRD+ Post PARPi tumor types: Prostate, Pancreas and Breast; Other Cyclin E+ Tumor Types include bladder, stomach, esophageal, lung squamous, lung adenocarcinoma, and breast cancer
Azenosertib Azenosertib Intermittent Monotherapy Dose Substantially Improves Antitumor Activity and Tolerability
12 Zentalis 001 Study Enabled Rapid and Efficient Approach to Dose Optimization Primary objectives: Safety, PK (Steady State Exposure (AUC0-24) & Concentration Maximum (Cmax)) Phase 1b expansion Intermittent Dosing Dose finding (CRM) Total daily dose, 5:2 or 4:3 schedule Phase 1a Dose Escalation Phase 1b Expansion 500mg 450mg 400mg 350mg 400mg qd 5:2 Continuous Dosing Phase 1a Dose Escalation 450mg 200mg Dose finding (CRM) Total daily dose, continuous schedule 400mg 350mg 300mg 300mg qd Lower doses Study Details: DLT period is 21 days • Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) occur every 2 cycles (6 weeks) • Protocol permits “Backfill” enrollment of additional patients at the highest previously cleared dose level Abbreviations: CRM, continual reassessment method; qd, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; 4:3, 4-days of treatment followed by 3-days off treatment; DLT, dose limiting toxicity; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; PK, pharmacokinetics; AUC, area under the curve NCT04158336
13Patients who received ≥300 mg; Abbreviations: 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; AUC, area under the curve Intermittent Dosing Resulted In A Significant Increase In Steady State Exposure With intermittent dosing, more patients reach the projected target efficacious steady-state exposure (AUC0-24) Azenosertib (mg) 300 350 400 450 350 400 450 500 Continuous Intermittent 5:2 AU C 0 -2 4 (n g* hr /m L) mean Intermittent 4:3 Data cut-off: April 24, 2023
14 Azenosertib Intermittent Dosing Schedule Doubles Objective Response Rate In Ovarian/USC Populations Data cut-off: June 2, 2023 *Response evaluable: have baseline measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, at least one post baseline scan, and received at least one dose of drug Patients who received ≥300 mg. Abbreviations: USC, uterine serous carcinoma; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; ORR, objective response rate; CI, confidence interval; +: Patients remain on therapy at the time of data cut-off 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 300 300 300 300 300 450 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 350 350 300 + + + + +U + + + + + + 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 350 500 500 400 500 400 350 400 400 400 400 450 450 450 500 350 350 350 450 Be st P er ce nt C ha ng e fr om B as el in e (% ) PR PD Continuous Intermittent CR /PR SD PD Best Overall Response Cohort N* ORR % (95% CI) Intermittent 19 36.8% (16.3, 61.6) Continuous 26 19.2% (6.5, 39.3) Overall 45 26.7% (14.6, 41.9)
15 Azenosertib Monotherapy Intermittent Dosing: 89% of Ovarian and USC Patients Had Target Lesion Reductions from their Baseline Scans + + ++ + ++ + + + + + Baseline Week 6 Week 12 Week 18 Week 24 Week 30 Week 36 PD PR -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Be st P er ce nt Ch an ge Fr om B as el in e (% ) Visit Tumor Type Ovarian USC Intermittent Dose Cohort N* ORR % (95% CI) Ovarian 13 30.8 % (9.09-61.4) Uterine Serous Carcinoma 6 50% (11.8-88.2) *Response evaluable: have baseline measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, at least one post baseline scan, and received at least one dose of drug; Patients who received ≥300 mg. Abbreviations: USC, uterine serous carcinoma; HGSOC, high-grade serous ovarian cancer SD, stable disease; PR, partial response; ORR, confirmed objective response rate; mPFS, median progression free survival; complete response; NR, Not reached, +: Patients remain on therapy at the time of data cut-off • 12/19 (63%) patients remain on therapy • Median follow up of 4.4 months • mPFS of 5.68 months (2.79, NR) • 10/13 (77%) of ovarian cancer patients had received a prior PARP inhibitor Data cut-off: June 2, 2023
16 Intermittent Dosing Maintains Safety And Tolerability Continuous (n=67) Intermittent (n=27) Total* (n=94) Treatment Related AEs, N (%) All Grade Grade 3/4 All Grade Grade 3/4 All Grade Grade 3/4 Gastrointestinal Nausea 46 (68.7) 2 (3.0) 9 (33.3) - 55 (58.5) 2 (2.1) Diarrhea 31 (46.3) 4 (6.0) 11 (40.7) 3 (11.1) 42 (44.7) 7 (7.4) Vomiting 28 (41.8) - 3 (11.1) - 31 (33.0) - Decreased appetite 20 (29.9) 1 (1.5) 4 (14.8) 1 (3.7) 24 (25.5) 2 ( 2.1) Dehydration 6 (9.0) - 3 (11.1) - 9 (9.6) - Fatigue 30 (44.8) 8 (11.9) 11 (40.7) 2 (7.4) 41 (43.6) 10 (10.6) Hematologic Anemia 6 (9.0) 2 (3.0) 6 (22.2) 3 (11.1) 12 (12.8) 5 (5.3) Thrombocytopenia 4 (6.0) 3 (4.5) 2 (7.4) - 6 (6.4) 3 (3.2) Neutropenia** 1 (1.5) 1 (1.5) 4 (14.8) 3 (11.1) 5 (5.3) 4 (4.3) *Safety Evaluable Population: Received at least one dose of drug; **No incidence of febrile neutropenia in either dosing group Continuous 300, 350, 400; Intermittent 350 5:2 and 400 5:2 Treatment Related AEs > 10% and treatment related AEs of interest: All Tumor Types Abbreviations: AE, adverse event Data cut-off: April 24, 2023
17 Azenosertib: Improved Tolerability Compared To Other Agents 14 .8 % 33 .3 % 0. 0% 55 .0 % 57 .0 % 15 .0 % 54 .0 % 72 .0 % 5. 0% 20 .0 % 33 .0 % 9. 0% Reduction Interruption Discontinuation Azenosertib-Intermittent (ZENTALIS001) Adavosertib (ADAGIO) Adavosertib (EFFORT) Mirvetuximab (SORAYA) 1 2 4 3 Data cut-off: April 24, 2023 1. ZENTALIS 001: data on file 2. (ADAGIO Phase 2b Study) Liu et. al. Presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology Annual Meeting, March 23–28, 2023 3. (EFFORT Phase 2 Study) Westin et. al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5505 Journal of Clinical Oncology 39, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2021) 5505-5505. 4. (SORAYA Phase 2 Study) Matulonis et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01900 Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 13 (May 01, 2023) 2436-2445. Comparisons to adavosertib and Mirvetuximab are not head-to-head comparisons
Azenosertib Monotherapy Paving Path to Registration with Three Ongoing Trials Accruing at New Intermittent Dose
19 Zentalis 004 (TETON): Azenosertib Monotherapy In Women With ≥2L Advanced Uterine Serous Carcinoma Endpoints NCT04814108 Patients (N=130) Azenosertib 400 mg QD 5:2 Key Eligibility: Recurrent or persistent USC; ≥1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen; Prior HER-2 directed therapy for known HER-2+; Prior anti-PDL-1; Measurable disease; ECOG PS 0-1; No prior WEE1 inhibitor; No prior cell cycle checkpoint inhibitor. DOR Safety and Tolerability ORR CURRENTLY ACCRUING- FDA Fast track designation Abbreviations: 2L, two lines; USC, uterine serous carcinoma; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score; QD, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; ORR, objective response rate; DOR, duration of response The FDA granted Fast Track designation in November 2021 to azenosertib in patients with advanced or metastatic USC who have received at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen for management of advanced or metastatic disease.
20 Zentalis 005 (DENALI): Evaluating Impact of CCNE1 Amplification and Cyclin E1+ in Platinum-Resistant High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Endpoints (ICR) Cohort 2B (N=80) CCNE1 Non-amplified & Cyclin E1+ Cohort 2C (N=40) CCNE1 Non-Amplified & Cyclin E1- Cohort 2A (N=60) CCNE1 Amplified NCT05128825 Cohort 1 (N=30) CCNE1 amplified and/or Cyclin E1+ Azenosertib 400 mg QD 5:2 Key Eligibility: High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer; ECOG PS 0-1; Platinum-resistant (excluding Platinum-refractory); 1-3 prior lines of chemotherapy; Measurable disease per RECIST v 1.1; Cyclin E1 IHC+ and/or CCNE1 amplified. CURRENTLY ACCRUING ORR DOR ORR DOR ORR DOR Abbreviations: ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; QD, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; ORR, objective response rate; DOR, Duration of Response; ICR, Independent Central Review
21Abbreviations: PARPi, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor; QD, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; PFS, progression free survival; ORR, objective response rate Zentalis 006 (MAMMOTH): Revised Phase 1/2 Study Of Azenosertib In Combination With Niraparib Or Alternating With Niraparib Or As A Monotherapy in Patients With PARP-resistant Ovarian Cancer Endpoints Azenosertib + niraparib alternating schedule Azenosertib monotherapy 400 mg QD 5:2 Azenosertib + niraparib administered concurrently NCT05198804 Enrollment* (N=138) * Enrollment Based on Slot Availability Key Eligibility: Recurrent high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (serous, clear cell or endometrioid); 1 – 5 prior lines for advanced/metastatic disease; Relapsed within 6 months of platinum therapy (platinum resistant), progressed after taking at least 3 months of PARPi as maintenance treatment. ORR Safety and Tolerability PFS, DOR CURRENTLY ACCRUING
Azenosertib Combination with Chemotherapy Strong and Durable Efficacy Signals and Favorable Safety Profile Across Chemotherapy Backbones Enable Advancement into Phase 3 in Ovarian Cancer
23 Addition of Azenosertib to Chemotherapies Increases Response Rates and Durability of Response in Ovarian Cancer Compared to Chemotherapy Alone Cyclin E1+ status associated with superior Objective Response Rate and longer Progression Free Survival across response-evaluable patient population Registrational Phase 3 Trial Announced in Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Overall tolerability of paclitaxel and carboplatin combinations compares favorably to SOC chemotherapy doublets paclitaxel-carboplatin or PLD-carboplatin Superior durability in carboplatin combination with 10.4-month Progression Free Survival and 36% Objective Response Rate 50% Objective Response Rate with 7.4-month Progression Free Survival in paclitaxel combination50% SOC, standard of care; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin
24 Zentalis 002: Phase 1b Combination Study To Define RP2D Dosing Azenosertib + Paclitaxel 200 mg QD 5:2 2 dose levels 300 mg QD 5:2 Azenosertib + Gemcitabine Azenosertib + PLD 200 mg QD 3 dose levels Cohort assignment by availability and investigator preference Paclitaxel: 80 mg/m2 on D1, D8, D15 (28-day cycles) Objectives Azenosertib + Carboplatin 300 mg QD Gemcitabine: D1, D8 (21-day cycles) 4 dose levels 200 mg QD 5:2 Carboplatin: AUC 5 mg/mL*min on D1 (21-day cycles) G: 1000 mg/m2 A: 200 mg QD 3 dose levels G: 600 mg/m2 A: 200 mg QD 5:2 400 mg QD 5:2 PLD: 40 mg/m2 D1 (28-day cycles) Dose Finding guided by a CRM Key Eligibility: High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer; ECOG Performance Status 0-2; Platinum-resistant/refractory; Up to 3 prior lines of chemotherapy; Measurable disease per RECIST v 1.1 Primary: Safety and Tolerability MTD and/or RP2D Key Secondary: Clinical Activity (Endpoints: ORR, DOR, PFS, CA125) NCT04516447 Abbreviations: ; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; CRM, continuous reassessment model; QD, once daily; D, day; AUC, area under the curve; G, gemcitabine; A, azenosertib; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; RP2D, recommended Phase 2 dose; ORR, objective response rate; DOR, duration of response; PFS, progression-free survival; Liu, J., et al. “Correlation of Cyclin E1 expression and clinical outcomes in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study of Azenosertib (ZN-c3), a WEE1 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with platinum- resistant or refractory (R/R) epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (EOC).” Poster presented ASCO 2023 Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
25 Encouraging Efficacy and Durability in Azenosertib Chemotherapy Doublets Endpoint Azenosertib + Paclitaxel (N=26) Azenosertib + Carboplatin (N=36) Azenosertib + Gemcitabine (N=18) Azenosertib + PLD (N=35) Total (N=115) Response-Evaluable* (N) 22 28 13 31 94 ORR (confirmed), N (%) 11 (50.0) 10 (35.7) 5 (38.5) 6 (19.4) 32 (34.0) Median DOR (95% CI) in months 5.6 (3.8-NE) 11.4 (8.3-NE) 6.2 (NE) 7.3 (1.5-NE) 8.3 (5.6-12.4) Clinical Benefit Rate (CR + PR + SD for ≥ 16 weeks), N (%) 18 (81.8) 16 (57.1) 6 (46.2) 24 (77.4) 64 (68.1) Median PFS (95% CI) in months 7.4 (5.5-NE) 10.4 (3.3-14.5) 8.3 (3.3-NE) 6.3 (3.7-11.0) 9.0 (5.8-13.7) *Response evaluable subjects are treated subjects with baseline measurable disease per RECIST version 1.1 and at least one post-baseline assessment. All objective responses were confirmed per RECIST v 1.1. Abbreviations: ; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; ORR, objective response rate; DOR, duration of response; CI, confidence interval; NE, not estimable; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PFS, progression-free survival; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors Liu, J., et al. “Correlation of Cyclin E1 expression and clinical outcomes in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study of Azenosertib (ZN-c3), a WEE1 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with platinum- resistant or refractory (R/R) epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (EOC).” Poster presented ASCO 2023 Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
26 Activity of Azenosertib + Paclitaxel is Robust and Competitively Favorable References: 1. Markman et al. Gynecol Oncol 2006;101:436-40. 2. AURELIA: Avastin USPI 3. MITO11: Pignata et al. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:561-68. 4. OCTOPUS: Banerjee et al. ESMO 2019. 5. GYN49: Moore et al. Clin Cancer Res 2022;28:36-44. 6. SORAYA: Matulonis et al. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:2436-45. 7. MIRASOL: Immunogen Press Release May 3, 2023. Abbreviations: ORR, objective response rate; mPFS, median progression free survival; m, months Comparisons to historic benchmarks on this slide are not head-to-head comparisons Liu, J., et al. “Correlation of Cyclin E1 expression and clinical outcomes in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study of Azenosertib (ZN-c3), a WEE1 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with platinum- resistant or refractory (R/R) epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (EOC).” Poster presented ASCO 2023 Data cut-off: April 10, 2023 21 30 25 29 29 32 42 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 O RR (% ) 3.9 3.5 4.1 5.5 5.5 5.6 7.4 0 2 4 6 8 Paclitaxel (N=55) Paclitaxel (N=36) Paclitaxel (N=68) Adavosertib + Paclitaxel (N=38) Mirvetuximab (N=105) Mirvetuximab (N~225) Azenosertib + Paclitaxel (N=26) mPFS (m) Objective Response Rate (ORR) Median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) 7 6 5 4 3 2
27 References: 1. Leitao et al. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:123-9. 2. CARTAXHY: Lortholary et al. Ann Oncol 2012;23:346-52. 3. Pectasides et al. Gynecol Oncol 2010;118:52-7. 4. Brewer et al. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:446-50. 5. MK- 1775-009: Leijen et al. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:4354-61. 6. GYN-49: Moore et al. Clin Cancer Res 2022;28:36-44. 7. SORAYA: Matulonis et al. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:2436-2445. 8. MIRASOL: Immunogen Press Release May 3, 2023. Abbreviations: ORR, objective response rate; mPFS, median progression free survival; m, months Comparisons to historic benchmarks on this slide are not head-to-head comparisons Liu, J., et al. “Correlation of Cyclin E1 expression and clinical outcomes in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study of Azenosertib (ZN-c3), a WEE1 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with platinum- resistant or refractory (R/R) epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (EOC).” Poster presented ASCO 2023 Activity of Azenosertib + Carboplatin is Robust and Highly Differentiated on Durability Data cut-off: April 10, 2023 23 37 39 16 43 30 32 42 36 0 10 20 30 40 50 ORR (%) 4.8 7.1 5.3 4.2 5.5 5.6 10.4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Carboplatin + Weekly Paclitaxel (N=51) Alternating Platinum Doublets (N=45) Adavosertib + Carboplatin (N=21) Adavosertib (5 doses) + Carboplatin (N=23) Mirvetuximab (N=105) Mirvetuximab (N~225) Azenosertib + Carboplatin (N=36) mPFS (m) Objective Response Rate (ORR) Median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) 8 7 6 5 3 2
28*Timing of tissue collection was not disclosed. Abbreviations: PFS: progression free survival, OS; overall survival Ovarian Cancer Patients with CCNE1 Amplified and/or Cyclin E1 Positive Cancers have a Worse Outcome Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Treatment Independent of Platinum-Sensitivity Status Hazard Ratio Cyclin E1 Alteration Worse outcome • 6 Studies; n=5404 • 4 Studies where timing of tissue collection was available-all were platinum sensitive tissue collected after ≤ 1 course of chemotherapy); 3533/5404 (65%) • Other 2 Studies did not disclose timing of tissue collection 1 2 4 53 Chan* (2020) [OS] Nakayama (2010) [OS] Petersen* (2020) [OS] Petersen* (2020) [PFS] Pils (2014) [OS] Stronach (2018) [OS] Stronach (2018) [PFS] N 500 100 1000 Amplification Amplification + Overexpression Kang (2023) [OS]
29 Zentalis 002: Majority of Ovarian Cancers are Cyclin E1+ IHC H-Score* >150 ≤ 150 to > 50 ≤ 50 CCNE1 Amplified 5 0 0 CCNE1 Not Amplified 25 15 6 Tissue Not Evaluated for Amplification 16 21 6 • H-score > 50 includes all CCNE1 amplified tumors • Prevalence of Cyclin E1-IHC+, H-score > 50 of all safety evaluable patients with tissue is 82/94 (87%); • Prevalence of Cyclin E1+ in the response evaluable patients with tissue is 70/82 (85%). Cy cl in E 1 IH C H- Sc or e* CCNE1 Status Amplified Not amplified Not Evaluated for Amplification 0 Patients 100 200 300 50 150 *H-scores calculated by multiplying the percentage of cells (0 to 100%) with intensity of Cyclin E1 expression (0 to 3); IHC: Immunohistochemistry Safety evaluable: received at least one dose of drug; Response evaluable: have baseline measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, at least one post baseline scan, and received at least one dose of drug Liu, J., et al. “Correlation of Cyclin E1 expression and clinical outcomes in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study of Azenosertib (ZN-c3), a WEE1 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with platinum- resistant or refractory (R/R) epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (EOC).” Poster presented ASCO 2023 Data cut-off: April 10, 2023 250
30 *Response evaluable patients (having received at least one scan) Abbreviations: IHC, immunohistochemistry ; CI, confidence interval Liu, J., et al. “Correlation of Cyclin E1 expression and clinical outcomes in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study of Azenosertib (ZN-c3), a WEE1 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with platinum-resistant or refractory (R/R) epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (EOC).” Poster presented ASCO 2023 Durability Triples in Patients with Cyclin E1+ Tumors Independent of Chemotherapy Backbone H-Score ≤ 50 (N=12) H-Score > 50 (N=78) Median PFS (months) 3.25 9.86 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 0.37 (0.18 – 0.79) Log-rank p-value 0.0078 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 5 10 15 20 25 Patients at risk 78 12 36 2 12 1 4 1 1 0 Pr og re ss io n- Fr ee S ur vi va l Pr ob ab ili ty Time (months) H-Score > 50 H-Score ≤ 50 Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
31 Abbreviations: C, Continuous azenosertib dosing; I, Intermittent azenosertib dosing; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin *All doses were at or below the MTD **A MTD for Gemcitabine + Azenosertib has not been determined, further dose cohorts are ongoing. Intermittent Dosing Across Chemotherapy Backbones Has Favorable Safety Profile Treatment-Related Adverse Event ≥20% N (%) Azenosertib + Paclitaxel (Continuous, N=7; Intermittent, N=19) Azenosertib + Carboplatin (Continuous, N=22; Intermittent, N=14) Azenosertib + Carboplatin (Continuous, N=14; Intermittent, N=8) Azenosertib + Gemcitabine (Continuous N=8; Intermittent, N=10) Azenosertib + PLD (Continuous N=27; Intermittent, N=8) Total (Continuous, N=64; Intermittent, N=51) All Doses* All Doses Doses ≤ MTD All Doses** All Doses* Grade All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 Hematologic Neutropenia C 5 (71.4) 5 (71.4) 9 (40.9) 7 (31.8) 4 (28.6) 3 (21.4) 7 (87.5) 6 (75.0) 19 (70.4) 17 (63.0) 40 (62.5) 35 (54.7) I 11 (57.9) 5 (26.3) 7 (50.0) 1 (7.1) 4 (50.0) - 7 (70.0) 4 (40.0) 3 (37.5) 3 (37.5) 28 (54.9) 13 (25.5) Thrombo- cytopenia C 4 (57.1) 2 (28.6) 16 (72.7) 11 (50.0) 11 (78.6) 6 (42.9) 8 (100.0) 5 (62.5) 9 (33.3) 2 (7.4) 37 (57.8) 20 (31.3) I 4 (21.1) - 9 (64.3) 5 (35.7) 4 (50.0) 2 (25.0) 8 (80.0) 6 (60.0)* 3 (37.5) 3 (37.5) 24 (47.1) 14 (27.5) Anemia C 5 (71.4) - 10 (45.5) 3 (13.6) 5 (35.7) 1 (7.1) 6 (75.0) 2 (25.0) 11 (40.7) 4 (14.8) 32 (50.0) 9 (14.1) I 8 (42.1) 1 (5.3) 10 (71.4) 4 (28.6) 4 (50.0) 1 (12.5) 5 (50.0) 2 (20.0) 2 (25.0) 1 (12.5) 25 (49.0) 8 (15.7) Gastro- intestinal Nausea C 4 (57.1) - 15 (68.2) 1 (4.5) 10 (71.4) 1 (7.1) 5 (62.5) - 16 (59.3) 2 (7.4) 40 (62.5) 3 (4.7) I 7 (36.8) 1 (5.3) 6 (42.9) - 3 (37.5) - 5 (50.0) - 4 (50.0) 1 (12.5) 22 (43.1) 2 (3.9) Vomiting C 3 (42.9) 1 (14.3) 8 (36.4) - 6 (42.9) - 1 (12.5) - 11 (40.7) 2 (7.4) 23 (35.9) 3 (4.7) I 2 (10.5) 1 (5.3) 2 (14.3) - 2 (25.0) - 1 (10.0) - 4 (50.0) 1 (12.5) 9 (17.6) 2 (3.9) Diarrhea C 4 (57.1) 1 (14.3) 4 (18.2) - 1 (7.1) - 1 (12.5) - 8 (29.6) - 17 (26.6) 1 (1.6) I 6 (31.6) 1 (5.3) 5 (35.7) - 3 (37.5) - 6 (60.0) - 2 (25.0) - 19 (37.3) 1 (2.0) Other Fatigue C 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3) 8 (36.4) - 3 (21.4) - 3 (37.5) 1 (12.5) 8 (29.6) 3 (11.1) 25 (39.1) 5 (7.8) I 8 (42.1) 2 (10.5) 5 (35.7) 1 (7.1) 4 (50.0) - 6 (60.0) 2 (20.0) 2 (25.0) - 21 (41.2) 5 (9.8) Liu, J., et al. “Correlation of Cyclin E1 expression and clinical outcomes in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study of Azenosertib (ZN-c3), a WEE1 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with platinum- resistant or refractory (R/R) epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (EOC).” Poster presented ASCO 2023 Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
32 *Gemcitabine + Azenosertib has exciting and durable activity-a MTD has not been determined, further dose cohorts are ongoing. Abbreviations: RP2D, recommended phase 2 dose; PLD pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; QD, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; D, day; AUC, area under the curve; mg/mL*min Data Supports Advancement of Azenosertib-Chemotherapy Combination into Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer & Earlier Line Therapy Main Takeaways • Strong and durable efficacy signal across chemotherapy backbones • Cyclin E1 status predicts benefit of azenosertib addition to chemotherapy • Suggests azenosertib restores chemotherapy sensitivity in heavily pre-treated platinum- resistant ovarian cancer • Plans to initiate Phase 3 study of azenosertib in combination with paclitaxel or with carboplatin in Cyclin E1+ platinum sensitive ovarian cancer RP2D Azenosertib Chemotherapy Paclitaxel 300 mg QD 5:2 80 mg/m2 on D1, D8, D15 (28-day cycles) Carboplatin 200 mg QD 5:2 AUC=5 on D1 (21-day cycles) Gemcitabine TBD* TBD* PLD 400 mg QD 5:2 40 mg/m2 D1 (28-day cycles) RP2D established for paclitaxel, carboplatin and PLD combinations
Azenosertib Advancing Programs Investigating Post-PARPi Treatment and Post-BEACON BRAF mCRC, Supported by Strong Body of Preclinical Data
341. Chen X Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;13(7). Abbreviations: PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; CDX, cell line derived xenograft; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; PDX, patient derived xenograft; TGI, tumor growth inhibition Monotherapy Azenosertib +/- PARP Inhibitor Combinations are Active in both Ovarian CDX and TNBC PDX Models OVCAR3 Model • Combination of PARP and WEE1 inhibitors in TNBC results in synergistic cell killing in preclinical models with either BRCA mutations or high levels of Cyclin E1 1 TNBC ModelCDX Ovarian Cancer Model (OVCAR3; CCNE1 Amp) PDX TNBC Model (HBCx-10; BRCA2mt) Vehicle qd Azenosertib 60 mg/kg, 5 on/2 off Azenosertib 60 mg/kg, 7 on/7 off Niraparib 35 mg/kg, 5 on/2 off + Azenosertib 60 mg/kg, 5 on/2 off Niraparib 35 mg/kg, 7 on/7 off + 60 mg/kg Azenosertib, 7 on/7 off (sequential) Niraparib 35 mg/kg, 7 on/7 off TGI Body Weight TGI Body Weight Vehicle Azenosertib 60 mg/kg, 5 on/2 off Niraparib 35 mg/kg, 5 on/2 off Azenosertib 60 mg/kg + Niraparib 35 mg/kg 5 on/2 off
35Source: Zentalis Data on File Preclinical Data Supports the Combination of Azenosertib with Encorafenib and Cetuximab (BEACON Regimen) • Oncogene-induced replication stress in mutationally driven cancers such as BRAF mutant colorectal cancer leads to DNA damage and genomic instability • Oncogene activation disrupts replication regulation leading to slow and stalled replication forks and other defects and leads to DNA damage • Dependency of cancers with replication stress on WEE1 signaling provides a mechanistic basis for synergy with EGFR/BRAF inhibition • Addition of azenosertib to the BEACON regimen is well tolerated and provides superior efficacy in an in vivo model of BRAF mutant CRC LS411N (BRAF mutant CRC model) Tu m or V ol um e (m m 3 ) Kotsantis, et al. Cancer Discov. 2018 May; 8(5): 537–555.
36 BRAF mCRC Study in Collaboration with Pfizer Key Eligibility: Patients with mCRC and documented BRAFV600E mutation; Disease progression after 1 or 2 previous regimens for metastatic disease; Prior therapy may include BRAF and/or EGFR directed therapy (e.g., may have progressed after BEACON regimen) Triplet Combination to be Investigated in Patients With Significant Unmet Need • Median OS in BRAF mutant CRC patients <1 year, vs. BRAF WT >2 years2 • While targeted BRAF inhibition (e.g., vemurafenib) has been successful in melanoma with response rates >80%, this strategy has failed in CRC (OR ~5%) due to innate resistance3 • Encorafenib in combination with cetuximab (BEACON) was approved for BRAF V600E mCRC in April 2020 and is now the standard of care Phase 1: Safety, tolerability, MTD, RP2D Phase 2: Dose ExpansionPhase 1: Dose Finding Primary Objectives Phase 2: ORR, DOR, DCR, PFS, TTP Escalating Dose Levels of azenosertib + encorafenib + cetuximab N=up to 80 patients Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Multi-center Study Of Azenosertib In Adults With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer 1 Sorbye H, Dragomir A, Sundström M, et al. High BRAF Mutation Frequency and Marked Survival Differences in Subgroups According to KRAS/BRAF Mutation Status and Tumor Tissue Availability in a Prospective Population-Based Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Cohort. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0131046. 2 Corcoran et al. Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition With Dabrafenib and Trametinib in BRAF V600–Mutant Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol (2015) Dec 1; 33(34): 4023-4031 3 Kopetz et al. Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E–Mutated Colorectal Cancer. NEJM (2019) 381: 1632-1643 Zentalis maintains full economic ownership and control of azenosertib, apart from Greater China rights (Zentara). Abbreviations: mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; RP2D, recommended phase 2 dose; ORR, objective response rate; DOR, duration of response; DCR, disease control rate; PFS, progression free survival; TTP, time to progression; OS, overall survival
ZN-d5 BCL-2 Inhibitor with Potential Best-in-Class Profile
38 BCL-2: A Clinically Validated Oncology Target • BCL-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein involved in tumor survival and resistance to chemotherapy 1 • The intrinsic apoptotic pathway is controlled by the BCL-2 protein family on outer mitochondrial membrane2, 3 • BCL-2 inhibitors may restore the normal apoptosis process, making it an important cancer therapeutic target Mechanism of Action of BCL-2 Inhibitors 1 BAXBIM BCL2 BCL2 BCL-2i BAX BCL-XL MCL1 BIM BCL2 BCL2 BIM BAX BAX BAX Cytochrome c Apoptosis 1. Konopleva M et al. Cancer Discov. 2016 Oct;6(10):1106-1117 2. Konopleva M and Letai A. Blood. 2018 Sep 6;132(10):1007-1012 3. Bhola PD and Letai A. Mol Cell. 2016;61(5):695-704
39 ZN-d5: A Potent BCL-2 Inhibitor Designed with Improved Selectivity for BCL-2 ZN-d5 has 10x Improved Selectivity for BCL-2 vs BCL-xL and Binds With Higher Affinity to BCL-2 Mutants than Venetoclax Compound ID Affinity (Kd, nM) IC50 (nM) BCL-2 Type BCL-2 BCL-xL MCL-1 WT G101V F104L D103Y Venetoclax 0.41 28 >30000 1.3 7.3 8.4 18.3 ZN-d5 0.29 190 >30000 1.4 3.7 1.4 5.0 ZN-d5 Exhibits Potent In Vitro Activity Across Multiple Tumor Cell Lines Compound ID CTG IC50 (nM) ALL MCL DLBCL AML RS4;11 Mino-1 Granta- 519 DOHH-2 Toledo HL-60 Molm-13 MV4-11 Venetoclax 2.9 1.1 161 43 191 26 18 3.8 ZN-d5 5.1 0.1 89 50 92 21 39 5.1 ZN-d5: Less Human Platelet Toxicity Compared to Venetoclax in an in vitro Assay ZN-d5 shows activity in preclinical models of ALL, NHL and AML Compound ID CTG (24 h) IC50 (mM) Venetoclax 0.6 ZN-d5 2.4 *Venetoclax data based on evaluation of comparable proxy chemical compound purchased from commercial sources rather than obtained from the pharmaceutical company developing the compound
40 ZN-d5 in AL (Primary) Amyloidosis • AL Amyloidosis: Deposition of immunoglobulin light chains • Clonal plasma cell population secretes misfolding light chain • Progressive systemic amyloid accumulation causes widespread organ damage • High morbidity and mortality • Orphan disease • Estimated worldwide prevalence is 75,000 1 • About 4k new cases/year in the US 2 • Not a cancer, but treated like one • Agents active in multiple myeloma used in first-line and relapsed/refractory settings • Daratumumab only approved therapy, for first-line use with CyBorD • Relapsed/refractory setting is a high unmet medical need AL Amyloidosis study is currently enrolling patients 34% 29% 5% 26% 5% CR VGPR PR SD/NR PD 63% VGPR/CR 1. Zhang et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019;19(suppl 10):e339 2. Kyle et al, Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94:465-471 3. Premkumar et al, Blood Cancer J 2021;11:10; hematologic response rate in 38 evaluable patients.
41 BCL-2 Inhibition has Shown Robust Clinical Activity in AL Amyloidosis Best Response in Evaluable Patients 5% 20% 26% 40% 19% 5% 10% 4% 29% 10% 37% 34% 20% 41% ALL PAT I ENTS (N =3 8 ) NON-T (11;14) PAT I ENT S (N=10) T (11 ;14) PAT IENT S (N=27) PROGRESSION SD/NR PR VGPR CR 30% VGPR/CR 63% GPR/CR 78% VGPR/CR 1. Premkumar et al, Blood Cancer J 2021;11:10; hematologic response rate in 38 evaluable patients. OS for All Patients • Patients with the t(11;14) translocation have a worse prognosis than the general AL amyloidosis population1 • BCL-2 inhibition showed an improved response rate in the t(11;14) cohort with a trend towards better survival
42 ZN-d5-003: Phase 1 Multicenter International Clinical Trial in R/R AL Amyloidosis Part A: Safety Recommended Phase 2 Dose Key Eligibility: AL amyloidosis ; R/R to 1-3 prior lines of therapy; dFLC ≥20 mg/L; ECOG PS ≤2; Adequate hematologic and organ function Part A: Bayesian Optimal Interval Dose Escalation Dose Escalation Primary Objectives Part B: Efficacy (Hematologic Response Rate) Total daily dose BID Study Details: DLT Period is 28 days • Hematologic disease response assessments done every cycle for the first 6 months • Protocol permits Backfill enrollment of additional patients at or below the highest previously cleared dose level NCT05199337 400 mg 1600 mg 1200 mg 800 mg 200 mg ZN-d5 Monotherapy at RP2D Part B: Dose Expansion RP2D Combo Abbreviations: R/R, refractory/resistant; AL, amyloid light chain; dFLC, difference between involved minus uninvolved serum free light chains; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score; BID, twice daily; RP2D, recommended Phase 2 dose
BCL-xL Protein Degrader Compelling Discovery Program
44 BCL-xL Degrader Background and Rationale Declared development candidate and initial IND enabling activities Therapeutic Hypothesis • BCL-xL is a member of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 proteins and is clinically validated. 1, 2 • Expression of BCL-xL contributes to therapeutic resistance mechanisms. 3, 4, 5 • Degrading BCL-xL will induce cell death and overcome resistance mechanisms in multiple cancer types, while reducing the possibility of on-target thrombocytopenia. Patient Selection • Heme malignancies • Solid tumors Internal Combination Opportunities Azenosertib (WEE1 inhibitor) and ZN-d5 (BCL-2 inhibitor) Therapeutic Window • BCL-xL is required for platelet viability and BCL-xL inhibitors (e.g. navitoclax) are dose limited in the clinic due to on-target thrombocytopenia.6 • A degradation approach with a non-functional or dysfunctional E3 ubiquitin ligase complex in platelets could help mitigate thrombocytopenia.7, 8 • Efficacy may be achieved at lower doses and frequencies due to the catalytic MOA of degraders, further reducing the chance of thrombocytopenia and increasing the therapeutic index. Chemical Modality Heterobifunctional degrader linking a BH3 binding moiety to an E3 binding moiety Competitive Landscape Multiple inhibitors and one degrader in the clinic (Ph1/2) 1. Bhola PD and Letai A. Mol Cell. 2016;61(5):695-704 2. Konopleva M and Letai A. Blood. 2018 Sep 6;132(10):1007-1012 3. Rahman SFA et al., Future Oncology, 2020, 16(28) 4. Yue et al., Cnacer Cell Int., 2020, 20(254) 5. cbioportal.org 6. Wilson WY et al., Lancet Oncol., 2010; 11(12):1149-1159 7. Khan et al. Nature Med 12, 1938-1947 (2019) 8. He et al. Nature Comm 11, (2020) Figure from: Delbridge, A. R. D., et. al. Nat Rev Cancer 16, 99-109 (2016)
45 BCL-xL Degrader is More Efficacious than BCL-xL Inhibitor (Navitoclax) in MOLT4 (T-ALL) Model MOLT4 tumor model (T-ALL) • BCL-xL degrader demonstrates excellent efficacy in the MOLT4 tumor model (T-ALL) and is well-tolerated at efficacious doses • BCL-xL degrader is more efficacious than Navitoclax Navitoclax data based on evaluation of comparable proxy chemical compound purchased from commercial sources rather than obtained from the pharmaceutical company developing the compound
46 2023 is a Catalyst Rich Year – Key Milestones Azenosertib WEE1 Inhibitor ZN-d5 BCL-2 Inhibitor Discovery 1Q 2023 Initiate enrollment in the BRAF mutant colorectal cancer BEACON regimen combination clinical trial in collaboration with Pfizer 1H 2023 Provide preclinical rationale for Cyclin E1 enrichment strategy at a scientific conference 1H 2023 Declare monotherapy RP2D and provide update on dose optimization activities, program timelines and potential paths to registration 1H 2023 Results from Phase 1b ovarian chemotherapy combination trial, including clinical translational data on Cyclin E1 amplification / overexpression 2H 2023 Update interim efficacy clinical data from monotherapy dose optimization in solid tumors 2H 2023 Update monotherapy program timelines and potential paths to registration 1Q 2024 Initiate randomized Phase 3 Trial of azenosertib + Chemotherapy in Cyclin E1+ platinum sensitive ovarian cancer 2H 2023 Provide interim clinical data and declare RP2D for Phase 1/2 monotherapy trial in amyloidosis 2H 2023 Provide preliminary data from clinical trial of azenosertib + ZN-d5 in relapsed / refractory acute myeloid leukemia 2023 Continue to advance the BCL-xL protein degrader program through IND enabling studies 2023 Advance ongoing research on protein degrader programs of undisclosed targets
zentalis.com Kimberly Blackwell, M.D. Chief Executive Officer kblackwell@zentalis.com (212) 433-3787 Melissa Epperly Chief Financial Officer mepperly@zentalis.com (212) 290-7271 Corporate Office 1359 Broadway Suite 801 New York, NY 10018 Science Center 10275 Science Center Drive Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121
Azenosertib Clinical Update Dose Selection, Monotherapy and Chemotherapy Combinations Efficacy and Safety and Ongoing Development June 2023 Nasdaq: ZNTL
2 Forward Looking Statement and Disclaimer Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Zentalis” or the “Company”) cautions that this presentation (including oral commentary that accompanies this presentation) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this presentation that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including without limitation statements regarding potential for our product candidates to be first-in-class and/or best-in-class; potential for accelerated approval paths; potential for our product candidates to be developed as monotherapies and in combination; potential for azenosertib (ZN-c3) to address large unmet need across an array of cancers; potential benefits of intermittent dosing for our product candidates; our development approach for azenosertib; timing of providing updates on azenosertib program timelines and potential paths to registration; timing of preclinical and clinical program updates; the potential unmet need in a particular indication and/or patient population; potential for combinations including our product candidates and the potential benefits thereof; the target profiles and potential benefits of our product candidates and their mechanisms of action, including as a monotherapyand/or in combination; our belief that we have strengthened our clinical development plans, including for azenosertib; timing of NDAs or final data read outs; the size of the potentially addressable patient populations; clinical and regulatory progress of our product candidates, including enrollment, initiation of clinical trials and data announcements; the market opportunities for and market potential of our product candidates; timing of initiating Phase 3 trial of azenosertib in combination with chemotherapy in Cyclin E1+ platinum sensitive ovarian cancer;, as well as statements that include the words “design,” “estimate,” “may,” “opportunity,” “plan,” “potential,” “predicts,” “promising,” “strategy,” “will” and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following: our limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate our current business and predict our future success and viability; we have and expect to continue to incur significant losses; our need for additional funding, which may not be available; our plans, including the costs thereof, of development of any diagnostic tools; the outcome of preclinical testing and early trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials; failure to identify additional product candidates and develop or commercialize marketable products; potential unforeseen events during clinical trials could cause delays or other adverse consequences; risks relating to the regulatory approval process or ongoing regulatory obligations; failure to obtain U.S. or international marketing approval; our product candidates may cause serious adverse side effects; inability to maintain our collaborations, or the failure of these collaborations; our reliance on third parties; effects of significant competition; the possibility of system failures or security breaches; risks relating to intellectual property; our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, and risks relating to management transitions; and significant costs as a result of operating as a public company. Other risks and uncertainties include those identified under the caption “Risk Factors” in our most recently filed periodic reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q and subsequent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in the future could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this presentation. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this presentation. New risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict all risks and uncertainties. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements except to the extent required by applicable law. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. No representations orwarranties (expressedor implied)are made about the accuracy of anysuchforward-looking statements. This presentation also contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and other data about our industry. These data involve a number of assumptions and l imitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such data and estimates. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the markets in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk. Neither we nor our affiliates, advisors or represen tatives makes any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of that data or undertake to update such data after the date of this presentation. ZENTALIS® and its associated logos are trademarks of Zentalis and/or its affiliates. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks appearing in this presentation are the property of their respective owners. All website addresses given in this presentation are for information only and are not intended to be an active link or to incorporate any website information into this document. Zentalis’ product candidates are investigational drugs and have not yet been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administratio n or any other regulatory authority.
3 Today’s Agenda 1 Review of Azenosertib Monotherapy Trial Results: Declaration of New Azenosertib Monotherapy Dose 2 Currently Accruing Trials in Ovarian Cancer and USC Review of Azenosertib + Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (Presented Yesterday: ASCO Abstract 5513)3 Proposed Phase 3 Chemotherapy Combination Trial4 Q&A5
Joining the Call Today 4 Kimberly Blackwell, MD Chief Executive Officer Zentalis Pharmaceuticals Carrie Brownstein, MD Chief Medical Officer Zentalis Pharmaceuticals Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD Chair of the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics -- the Phase 1 Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Member, Zentalis Scientific. Advisory Board
5 Zentalis’ Clinical Transformation Has Yielded Significant Progress • To develop first in class and best in class therapies against known cancer targets Purpose Positioned to Execute and Deliver • Management team with deep oncology experience • Respected scientific and clinical advisors • Established partnerships with Pfizer, GSK • Multiple opportunities in hematologic malignancies • 100+ patients dosed to date Promising Programs: BCL-2i and Degrader • High potential, validated target in difficult-to-treat tumors • WEE1 inhibitor designed to have superior selectivity and pharmacologic properties • Monotherapy activity and favorable safety profile • 400+ patients dosed to date Azenosertib meets all the criteria People
6 Today’s Call - Two Large Phase 1 Data Sets: Four Critical Take Home Messages Around Azenosertib Combination With Single Agent Chemotherapy Improves Response Rates And Durability Over Chemotherapy Alone In Platinum-resistant/Refractory Ovarian Cancer: • 50% ORR, 5.6 month DOR and a 7.4 month mPFS with paclitaxel • 36% ORR, 11.4 month DOR and a 10.4 month mPFS with carboplatin Comprehensive and Ongoing Development Strategy In Ovarian Cancer and USC: • Phase 2 Monotherapy in USC (all patients) • Phase 2 Monotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer • Phase 1/2 Monotherapy or in combination/alternating with niraparib PARPi-resistant PROC • Proposed Phase 3 Study in Cyclin E1+ platinum sensitive ovarian cancer • Chemotherapy + azenosertib followed by azenosertib monotherapy maintenance compared to doublet chemotherapy followed by placebo Monotherapy Dose Optimization Has Been Successful: • Confirmed ORR of 36.8% in heavily pre-treated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and USC • Improved tolerability over other WEE-1 Inhibitor and highly comparable to Antibody Drug Conjugates USC, Uterine Serous Carcinoma; ORR, Confirmed Objective Response Rate; DOR, Duration of Response; mPFS, Median Progression Free Survival.
AZENOSERTIB NEW INTERMITTENT MONOTHERAPY DOSE
8 Azenosertib Intermittent Monotherapy Dose Substantially Improves Antitumor Activity and Tolerability Compared to prior dosing regimen (300 mg continuous), intermittent dosing led to: • More than a doubling of exposures • A near doubling of response in both USC and HGSOC • Confirmed ORR of 36.8% in the patient population* • Maintains or improves safety and tolerability *Response evaluable: have baseline measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, at least one post baseline scan, and received at least o ne dose of drug; Abbreviations: 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; USC, Uterine Serous Carcinoma; HGSOC, High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer; ORR, objective response rate Monotherapy Dose Selection: 400 mg intermittent (5 days on, 2 days off a week; 5:2)
9 • WEE1 phosphorylates CDK/Cyclin complexes to engage cell cycle checkpoints, allowing DNA repair to occur • Azenosertib inhibits WEE1: • Leads to dephosphorylation of CDK 1 and 2, activating the cdk/cyclin complexes • Removes 2 cell cycle checkpoints: G1/S and G2/M • Cell cycle progresses without sufficient DNA repair • Cancer cells accumulate DNA damage, resulting in apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe Azenosertib’sMOA and early monotherapy clinical activity made dose optimization critical WEE1 activity in untreated cancer cell Azenosertib blocks WEE1 resulting in cancer cell death Azenosertib Targets WEE1, a Critical Protein for Cancer Cell Survival CDK2/Cyclin E PhosphorylationP WEE1 P P P S G2 M G1 Cell survival Cancer progression P CDK1/Cyclin A Azenosertib WEE1 CDK2/Cyclin E Cell death S G2 M G1 CDK1/Cyclin A Luserna di Rora, et al. 2020. J Hem Onc. 13:126. Elbaek et al. 2022. Cell Reports. 38:110261. Abbreviations: MOA, mechanism of action
10 Increased exposures at steady state Maintained or improved tolerability Finding The Optimal Dose of Azenosertib A m o u n t o f D ru g in B lo o d 300 mg continuous dose demonstrated favorable safety profile and antitumor activity, but preclinical models and clinical data suggested that intermittent dosing would allow for: Therapeutic Index
11 Zentalis 001 Study: From First In Human to Dose Optimization Primary objectives: Safety, PK [Steady State Exposure (AUC0-24) & Concentration Maximum (Cmax)] Phase 1b expansion Intermittent Dosing Dose finding (CRM) Total daily dose, 5:2 or 4:3 schedule Phase 1a Dose Escalation Phase 1b Expansion 500mg 450mg 400mg 350mg 400mg qd 5:2 Continuous Dosing Phase 1a Dose Escalation 450mg 200mg Dose finding (CRM) Total daily dose, continuous schedule 400mg 350mg 300mg 300mg qd Lower doses Study Details: DLT period is 21 days • Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) occur every 2 cycles (6 weeks) • Protocol permits “Backfill” enrollment of additional patients at the highest previously cleared dose level Abbreviations: CRM, continual reassessment method; qd, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; 4:3, 4-days of treatment followed by 3-days off treatment; DLT, dose limiting toxicity; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; PK, pharmacokinetics; AUC, area under the curve NCT04158336
12 Zentalis 001: Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Continuous N = 74 Intermittent N = 53 Total N = 127 Age Median 67 64 65 Range (Min-Max) (41 - 81) (35 - 83) (35 – 83) Measurable Disease (N, %) 70 (94.6) 53 (100) 123 (96.9) ECOG PS (N, %) ECOG 0 20 (27.0) 18 (34.0) 38 (29.9) ECOG 1 53 (71.6) 35 (66.0) 88 (69.3) ECOG 2 1 (1.4) - 1 ( 0.8) Prior Lines of treatment Mean (range) 4.33 (1-18) 4.71 (1-10) 4.37 (1-18) Prior Therapies (N, %) Prior PARPi 9 (12.2) 13 (24.5) 22 (17.3) Prior experimental agent 30 (40.5) 19 (35.8) 49 (38.6) Prior VEGF-inhibitor 42 (56.8) 31 (58.5) 73 (57.5) Prior anti-PD1/PDL1 35 (47.3) 18 (34.0) 53 (41.7) Data cut-off: April 24, 2023 Patients who received ≥300 mg; Abbreviations: ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; PARPi, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; PD1/PDL1, programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1
13 Zentalis 001: Multiple Tumor Types, No Biomarker Stratification N=127 • Clear Cell RCC • NSCLC • Gastric Cancer • Head and Neck SCC • Anal SCC • Melanoma • SCLC • Uterine stromal sarcoma • Small cell ovarian • Carcinosarcoma • Adenoid cystic carcinoma • Appendiceal (includes N ≤ 2) No biomarker, biopsy or prior therapy requirements for enrollment Patients who received ≥300 mg; Abbreviations: USC, uterine serous carcinoma; CRC, colorectal cancer; RCC, renal cell carcinom a; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung cancer Data cut-off: April 24, 2023
14 Patients who received ≥300 mg; Collected at Day 12 after 3 consecutive days of dosing Abbreviations: 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; AUC, area under the curve Intermittent Dosing Resulted In A Significant Increase In Steady State Exposure (AUC0-24 ) With intermittent dosing, more patients reach the projected target efficacious steady-state exposure (AUC0-24) Azenosertib (mg) 300 350 400 450 350 400 450 500 Continuous Intermittent 5:2 A U C 0 -2 4 (n g* h r/ m L) mean Intermittent 4:3 Data cut-off: April 24, 2023
15Data cut-off: April 24, 2023 Patients who received ≥300 mg; Collected at Day 12 after 3 consecutive days of dosing Intermittent Dosing Achieves Higher Maximal Concentration (Cmax) Levels
AZENOSERTIB MONOTHERAPY EFFICACY IN OVARIAN AND UTERINE SEROUS CARCINOMA
17 Zentalis 001: Patients With Uterine Serous Carcinoma And Ovarian Cancer After Multiple Prior Therapies 51 Patients Enrolled with Uterine Serous Carcinoma or High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer • Continuous and Intermittent dosing schedules • Heavily Pretreated Group of Patients: USC N = 26 HGSOC N = 25 Prior Lines of treatment Mean (Range) 3.4 (1-9) 5.3 (1-18) Platinum Resistant 26 (100%) 25 (100%) Prior Therapies Prior PARPi 2 (7.7) 17 (68.0) Prior experimental agent 5 (19.2) 7 (28.0) Prior VEGF-inhibitor 19 (73.1) 21 (84.0) Prior anti-PD1/PDL1 19 (73.1) 5 (20.0) Patients who received ≥300 mg; Abbreviations: USC, uterine serous carcinoma; HGSOC, high -grade serous ovarian cancer PARPi, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; PD1/PDL1, programmed cell death receptor 1/programmed death ligand 1 Data cut-off: April 24, 2023
18 Azenosertib Intermittent Dosing Schedule Doubles Objective Response Rate In Ovarian/USC Populations Data cut-off: June 2, 2023 *Response evaluable: have baseline measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, at least one post baseline scan, and received at least o ne dose of drug Patients who received ≥300 mg. Abbreviations: USC, uterine serous carcinoma; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; ORR, objective response rate; CI, confidence interval; +: Patients remain on the rapy at the time of data cut-off 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 300 300 300 300 300 450 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 350 350 300 + + + + +U + + + + + + 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 350 500 500 400 500 400 350 400 400 400 400 450 450 450 500 350 350 350 450 B e st P e rc e n t C h an ge fr o m B as e li n e (% ) PR PD Continuous Intermittent CR /PR SD PD Best Overall Response Cohort N* ORR % (95% CI) Intermittent 19 36.8% (16.3, 61.6) Continuous 26 19.2% (6.5, 34.9) Overall 45 26.7% (14.6, 41.9) +
19 Azenosertib Monotherapy Intermittent Dosing: 89% of Ovarian and USC Patients Had Target Lesion Reductions from their Baseline Scans + + + + + ++ + + + + + Baseline Week 6 Week 12 Week 18 Week 24 Week 30 Week 36 PD PR -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 B e st P e rc e n tC h an ge Fr o m B as el in e (% ) Visit Tumor Type Ovarian USC Intermittent Dose Cohort N* ORR % (95% CI) Ovarian 13 30.8 % (9.09-61.4) Uterine Serous Carcinoma 6 50% (11.8-88.2) *Response evaluable: have baseline measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, at least one post baseline scan, and received at least o ne dose of drug; Patients who received ≥300 mg. Abbreviations: USC, uterine serous carcinoma; HGSOC, high-grade serous ovarian cancer SD, stable disease; PR, partial response; ORR, confirmed objective response rate; mPFS, median progression free survival; complete response; NR, Not reached, +: Patients remain on therapy at the time of data cut -off • 12/19 (63%) patients remain on therapy • Median follow up of 4.4 months • mPFS of 5.68 months (2.79, NR) • 10/13 (77%) of ovarian cancer patients had received a prior PARP inhibitor Data cut-off: June 2, 2023
20 Abbreviations: cPR, confirmed partial response; HGSOC, high-grade serous ovarian cancer; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response. Azenosertib Patient Profile: Durable cPR In Cyclin E Amplified Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer Screening Timepoint 2 Prior lines of therapy: 1. Avelumab (SD) 2. Doxorubicin Liposomal (PD) 3. Topotecan/bevacizumab (PD) 4. Cyclophosphamide/bevacizumab (unknown) 5. XMT1536 (NaPi2b ADC) (PR) 6. APG115 (MDM2 inh) / Pembrolizumab (SD) 7. ABBV-155 (CD275 ADC) (PD) 8. NC318 (Siglec-15 mAB) (SD) 9. SM08502 (CLK inhibitor) (PD) 10. NBMBMX (HDAC8 inh) (SD) TL1: Baseline TL1: Timepoint6 73-year-old female w/ HGSOC CCNE1amp (Foundation) Response cPR (-71%) Treatment Length 11 months Current Status Off treatment Baseline 12 weeks
21 Azenosertib Patient Profile: Durable cPR In HRD+ PARPi Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer Screening Screening Timepoint 2 Target Lesion No Longer Visualized Prior lines of therapy 1. Carbo/taxol/abraxane/bev/Olaparib (PD) 2. Pembrolizumab (PD) 3. NaPi2b targeting-ADC (XMT-1536) (PD) 4. Carbo/gem/bevacizumab (PD) 5. Pegylated doxorubicin (PD) 6. Topotecan (PD) 7. PABP-1 RNP (ATRC-101) (PD) 64-year-old female HGSOC; BRCA1m (Foundation) Response cPR (-48%) Treatment Length 5 months Current Status On treatment Abbreviations: cPR, confirmed partial response HGSOC, high-grade serous ovarian cancer; HRD+, homologous recombination repair deficiency; PARPi, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor; high-grade serous ovarian cancer; BRCA1m, BRCA1 mutant; PD, progressive disease Baseline
AZENOSERTIB MONOTHERAPY SAFETY IN PATIENTS FROM ZENTALIS 001
23 Intermittent Dosing Maintains Safety And Improves Tolerability Over Continuous Dosing Continuous (n=67) Intermittent (n=27) Total* (n=94) Treatment Related AEs, N (%) All Grade Grade 3/4 All Grade Grade 3/4 All Grade Grade 3/4 Gastrointestinal Nausea 46 (68.7) 2 (3.0) 9 (33.3) - 55 (58.5) 2 (2.1) Diarrhea 31 (46.3) 4 (6.0) 11 (40.7) 3 (11.1) 42 (44.7) 7 (7.4) Vomiting 28 (41.8) - 3 (11.1) - 31 (33.0) - Decreased appetite 20 (29.9) 1 (1.5) 4 (14.8) 1 (3.7) 24 (25.5) 2 ( 2.1) Dehydration 6 (9.0) - 3 (11.1) - 9 (9.6) - Fatigue 30 (44.8) 8 (11.9) 11 (40.7) 2 (7.4) 41 (43.6) 10 (10.6) Hematologic Anemia 6 (9.0) 2 (3.0) 6 (22.2) 3 (11.1) 12 (12.8) 5 (5.3) Thrombocytopenia 4 (6.0) 3 (4.5) 2 (7.4) - 6 (6.4) 3 (3.2) Neutropenia** 1 (1.5) 1 (1.5) 4 (14.8) 3 (11.1) 5 (5.3) 4 (4.3) *Safety Evaluable Population: Received at least one dose of drug; **No incidence of febrile neutropenia in either dosing group Continuous 300, 350, 400; Intermittent 350 5:2 and 400 5:2 Treatment Related AEs > 10% and treatment related AEs of interest: All Tumor Types Abbreviations: AE, adverse event Data cut-off: April 24, 2023
24 *Safety Evaluable Population: Received at least one dose of drug; Continuous 300, 350, 400; Intermittent 350 5:2 and 400 5:2 Abbreviations: SAEs, serious adverse events Azenosertib At Intermittent Schedules Reduces Dose Modifications And Serious Adverse Events Continuous N = 67 Intermittent N = 27 Total* N =94 Treatment Related AEs leading to, N (%): Dose reduction 19 (28.4) 4 (14.8) 23 (24.5) Dose interruption 17 (25.4) 9 (33.3) 26 (27.7) Discontinuation 4 (6.0) - 4 (4.3) Death - - - Treatment Related SAEs 5 (7.5) - 5 (5.3) Data cut-off: April 24, 2023
25 Azenosertib: Tolerability* Compared To Adavosertib and Mirvetuximab 14 .8 % 33 .3 % 0. 0% 55 .0 % 57 .0 % 15 .0 % 5 4 .0 % 72 .0 % 5. 0% 2 0 .0 % 3 3 .0 % 9. 0 % Reduction Interruption Discontinuation Azenosertib-Intermittent (ZENTALIS001) Adavosertib (ADAGIO) Adavosertib (EFFORT) Mirvetuximab (SORAYA) 1 2 4 3 Data cut-off: April 24, 2023 *Attributable to Treatment Related AEs. Not direct head-to-head comparisons. 1. ZENTALIS 001: data on file 2. (ADAGIO Study) Liu et. al. Presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology Annual Meeting, March 23 –28, 2023 3. (EFFORT Study) Westin et. al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5505 Journal of Clinical Oncology 39, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2021) 5505-5505. 4. (SORAYA Study) Matulonis et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01900 Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 13 (May 01, 2023) 2436-2445.
AZENOSERTIB MONOTHERAPY ONGOING STUDIES IN USC AND OVARIAN CANCER
27 Monotherapy Dose and Biomarker Enrichment Is Foundational To Our Clinical Strategy Cyclin E1 0 0.1 0.3 1 µM Azenosertib p-CHK1 Cleaved Caspase-3 γH2AX p-H3 Azenosertib induces markers of DNA damage, replicative stress, and apoptosis* *OVCAR3 Cyclin E1 positive cells, 16-hour treatment High genomic instability can be caused by: Cyclin E1+ Tumors • Cyclin E1+ drives accelerated entry into S-phase through its partnership with CDK2 • Replication machinery is overloaded, resulting in genomic instability Homologous Recombination Repair Defective (HRD+) Tumors • Results in genomic instability through tumors inability to repair double stranded DNA breaks. Tumors with High Genomic Instability are Sensitive to Azenosertib
28 Zentalis 004 (TETON): Azenosertib Monotherapy In Women With ≥2L Advanced Uterine Serous Carcinoma Endpoints NCT04814108 Patients (N=130) Azenosertib 400 mg QD 5:2 Key Eligibility: Recurrent or persistent USC; ≥1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen; Prior HER-2 directed therapy for known HER-2+; Prior anti-PDL-1; Measurable disease; ECOG PS 0-1; No prior WEE1 inhibitor; No prior cell cycle checkpoint inhibitor. DOR Safety and Tolerability ORR CURRENTLY ACCRUING- FDA Fast track designation Abbreviations: 2L, two lines; USC, uterine serous carcinoma; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score; QD, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; ORR, objective response rate; DOR, duration of response
29 Zentalis 005 (DENALI): Evaluating Impact of CCNE1 Amplification and Cyclin E1+ in Platinum-Resistant High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Endpoints (ICR) Cohort 2B (N=80) CCNE1 Non-amplified & Cyclin E1+ Cohort 2C (N=40) CCNE1 Non-Amplified & Cyclin E1- Cohort 2A (N=60) CCNE1 Amplified NCT05128825 Cohort 1 (N=30) CCNE1 amplified and/or Cyclin E1+ Azenosertib 400 mg QD 5:2 Key Eligibility: High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer; ECOG PS 0-1; Platinum-resistant (excluding Platinum-refractory); 1-3 prior lines of chemotherapy; Measurable disease per RECIST v 1.1; Cyclin E1 IHC+ and/or CCNE1 amplified. CURRENTLY ACCRUING ORR DOR ORR DOR ORR DOR Abbreviations: ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid t umors; QD, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; ORR, objective response rate; DOR, Duration of Response; ICR, Independent Central Review
30 Abbreviations: PARPi, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor; QD, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; PFS, progression free survival; ORR, objective response rate Zentalis 006 (MAMMOTH): Revised Phase 1/2 Study Of Azenosertib In Combination With Niraparib Or Alternating With Niraparib Or As A Monotherapy in Patients With PARP-resistant Ovarian Cancer Endpoints Azenosertib + niraparib alternating schedule Azenosertib monotherapy 400 mg QD 5:2 Azenosertib + niraparib administered concurrently NCT05198804 Enrollment* (N=138) * Enrollment Based on Slot Availability Key Eligibility: Recurrent high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (serous, clear cell or endometrioid); 1 – 5 prior lines for advanced/metastatic disease; Relapsed within 6 months of platinum therapy (platinum resistant), progressed after taking at least 3 months of PARPi as maintenance treatment. ORR Safety and Tolerability PFS, DOR CURRENTLY ACCRUING
31 • Recommended Phase 2 dose of 400 mg at 5:2 schedule selected based on clinical safety and efficacy • Update on monotherapy efficacy data, and clinical trial timelines in 2H23 36.8% Confirmed Response Rate in Ovarian and Uterine Serous Carcinomas with intermittent dosing* Majority of patients remain on intermittent treatment Azenosertib is Highly Active Agent in Ovarian Cancer and USC and has Favorable Safety Profile *Response evaluable patients (having received at least one scan) USC, Uterine Serous Carcinoma
AZENOSERTIB CHEMOTHERAPY COMBINATIONS
33 Correlation of Cyclin E1 expression and clinical outcomes in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study of Azenosertib (ZN-c3), a WEE1 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with platinum- resistant or refractory (R/R) epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (EOC) Joyce Liu1, Siqing Fu2, Gary Richardson3, Zivko Vranjes4, Tarek Meniawy5, Catherine Shannon6, Erika P. Hamilton7, Stephanie Blank8, Cara Mathews9, Jasmina Alidzanovic10, Rossitza Krasteva11, Qing Shi13, Olivier Harismendy13, Mieke Ptaszynski14, Shannon N. Westin2, Funda Meric-Bernstam2, Premal H.Thaker15 1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 3Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Australia; 4University Clinical Center of Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 5Linear Cancer Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; 6Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; 7Tennessee Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; 8Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY; 9Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; 10University Clinical Center Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 11Uni Hospital, Panagyurishte, Bulgaria; 13Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY; 14FormerlyZentalis Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY; 15Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St Louis, MO Abstract #5513 Poster Bd #208
34 *Gemcitabine + Azenosertib has exciting and durable activity-a MTD has not been determined, further dose cohorts are ongoing. Abbreviations: RP2D, recommended phase 2 dose; PLD pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; QD, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; D, day; AUC, area under the curve; mg/mL*min Main Takeaways • Strong and durable efficacy signal across chemotherapy backbones - cORR of 34%; cDOR of 8.3 months; mPFS of 9.0 months (response evaluable=94) • Cyclin E1 status predicts benefit of azenosertib addition to chemotherapy • Suggests azenosertib restores chemotherapy sensitivity in heavily pre-treated platinum- resistant ovarian cancer RP2D Azenosertib Chemotherapy Paclitaxel 300 mg QD 5:2 80 mg/m2 on D1, D8, D15 (28-day cycles) Carboplatin 200 mg QD 5:2 AUC=5 on D1 (21-day cycles) Gemcitabine TBD* TBD* PLD 400 mg QD 5:2 40 mg/m2 D1 (28-day cycles) Data cut-off: April 10, 2023 RP2D established for paclitaxel, carboplatin and PLD combinations Azenosertib Is Active With Favorable Tolerability Profile in Combination with Chemotherapy
35 Phase 1b combination study to define RP2D dosing Azenosertib + Paclitaxel 200 mg QD 5:2 2 dose levels 300 mg QD 5:2 Azenosertib + Gemcitabine Azenosertib + PLD 200 mg QD 3 dose levels Cohort assignment by availability and investigator preference Paclitaxel: 80 mg/m2 on D1, D8, D15 (28-day cycles) Objectives Azenosertib + Carboplatin 300 mg QD Gemcitabine: D1, D8 (21-day cycles) 4 dose levels 200 mg QD 5:2 Carboplatin: AUC 5 mg/mL*min on D1 (21-day cycles) G: 1000 mg/m2 A: 200 mg QD 3 dose levels G: 600 mg/m2 A: 200 mg QD 5:2 400 mg QD 5:2 PLD: 40 mg/m2 D1 (28-day cycles) Dose Finding guided by a CRM Key Eligibility: High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer; ECOG Performance Status 0-2; Platinum-resistant/refractory; Up to 3 prior lines of chemotherapy; Measurable disease per RECIST v 1.1 Primary: Safety and Tolerability MTD and/or RP2D Key Secondary: Clinical Activity (Endpoints: ORR, DOR, PFS, CA125) NCT04516447 Abbreviations: ; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; 5:2, 5 -days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; CRM, continuous reassessment model; QD, once daily; D, day; AUC, area under the curve; G, gemcitabine; A, azenosertib; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; RP2D, recommended Phase 2 dose; ORR, objective response rate; DOR, duration of response; PFS, progression -free survival; Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
36 *Safety Evaluable Population: Received at least one dose of drug. Abbreviations: PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; NR, not reported; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Patient Characteristics* Characteristic Azenosertib + Paclitaxel (N=26) Azenosertib + Carboplatin (N=36) Azenosertib + Gemcitabine (N=18) Azenosertib + PLD (N=35) Total (N=115) Age, years Median (Range) 61.5 (45-83) 61.0 (48-77) 62.5 (47-77) 56.0 (34-75) 61.0 (34-83) Race and Ethnicity, N (%) White 24 (92.3) 34 (94.4) 16 (88.9) 34 (97.1) 108 (93.9) Black or African-American 0 0 0 0 0 Asian 1 (3.8) 1 (2.8) 1 (5.6) 1 (2.9) 4 (3.5) Other / NR 1 (3.8) 1 (2.8) 1 (5.6) 0 3 (2.6) Hispanic (Yes/No/NR) 1/25/0 (3.8/96.2/0) 0/34/2 (0/94.4/5.6) 1/17/0 (5.6/94.4/0) 1/33/1 (2.9/94.3/2.9) 3/109/3 (2.6/94.8/2.6) ECOG Performance Status, N (%) 0 21 (80.8) 21 (58.3) 12 (66.7) 24 (68.6) 78 (67.8) 1 5 (19.2) 15 (41.7) 6 (33.3) 11 (31.4) 37 (32.2) Geographic Region, N (%) US 6 (23.1) 10 (27.8) 10 (55.6) 5 (14.3) 31 (27.0) Europe 10 (38.5) 10 (27.8) 6 (33.3) 27 (77.1) 53 (46.1) Australia 9 (34.6) 15 (41.7) 1 (5.6) 3 (8.6) 28 (24.3) Korea 1 (3.8) 1 (2.8) 1 (5.6) 0 3 (2.6) Platinum Status Refractory, n (%) 5 (19.2) 9 (25.0) 3 (16.7) 7 (20.0) 24 (20.9) Prior Lines of Therapy 1-2, n (%) 22 (84.6) 30 (83.3) 18 (100) 33 (94.3) 103 (89.6) 3-4, n (%) 4 (15.4) 6 (16.7) - 2 (5.7) 12 (10.4) Prior PARP Inhibitor n (%) 8 (30.8) 10 (27.8) 5 (27.8) 5 (14.3) 28 (24.3) Prior Bevacizumab n (%) 8 (30.8) 18 (50.0) 6 (33.3) 15 (42.9) 47 (40.9) Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
37 High Response of Azenosertib Doublets Endpoint Azenosertib + Paclitaxel (N=26) Azenosertib + Carboplatin (N=36) Azenosertib + Gemcitabine (N=18) Azenosertib + PLD (N=35) Total (N=115) Response-Evaluable* (N) 22 28 13 31 94 ORR (confirmed), N (%) 11 (50.0) 10 (35.7) 5 (38.5) 6 (19.4) 32 (34.0) Median DOR (95% CI) in months 5.6 (3.8-NE) 11.4 (8.3-NE) 6.2 (NE) 7.3 (1.5-NE) 8.3 (5.6-12.4) Clinical Benefit Rate (CR + PR + SD for ≥ 16 weeks), N (%) 18 (81.8) 16 (57.1) 6 (46.2) 24 (77.4) 64 (68.1) Median PFS (95% CI) in months 7.4 (5.5-NE) 10.4 (3.3-14.5) 8.3 (3.3-NE) 6.3 (3.7-11.0) 9.0 (5.8-13.7) *Response evaluable subjects are treated subjects with baseline measurable disease per RECIST version 1.1 and at least one po st-baseline assessment. All objective responses were confirmed per RECIST v 1.1. Abbreviations: ; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; ORR, objective response rate; DOR, duration of response; CI, confidence interval; NE, not estimable; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PFS, progression-free survival; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
38 Abbreviations: PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; PFS, progression free survival; m, months. Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free Survival: Durable Responses 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 5 10 15 20 25 P ro gr es si o n -F re e Su rv iv al P ro b ab ili ty Median PFS (months) Azenosertib combined with Time (months) Patients at risk 35 36 26 18 18 8 11 4 7 4 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 Paclitaxel PLD Carboplatin Gemcitabine 6.28 m PLD (N=35) Paclitaxel (N=26) 7.36 m Gemcitabine (N=18) 8.31 m Carboplatin (N=36) 10.35 m Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
39 21 30 25 29 29 32 42 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 O R R ( % ) The Activity of Azenosertib + Paclitaxel is Robust and Durable Compared to Historical Reports of Single Agent Paclitaxel, Adavosertib + Paclitaxel and Mirvetuximab in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer 3.9 3.5 4.1 5.5 5.5 5.6 7.4 0 2 4 6 8 Paclitaxel (N=55) Paclitaxel (N=36) Paclitaxel (N=68) Adavosertib + Paclitaxel (N=38) Mirvetuximab (N=105) Mirvetuximab (N~225) Azenosertib + Paclitaxel (N=26) mPFS (m) Objective Response Rate (ORR) Median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) References: 1. Markman et al. Gynecol Oncol 2006;101:436-40. 2. AURELIA: Avastin USPI 3. MITO11: Pignata et al. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:561-68. 4. OCTOPUS: Banerjee et al. ESMO 2019. 5. GYN49: Moore et al. Clin Cancer Res 2022;28:36-44. 6. SORAYA: Matulonis et al. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:2436-45. 7. MIRASOL: Immunogen Press Release May 3, 2023. Abbreviations: ORR, objective response rate; mPFS, median progression free survival; m, months. Not direct head-to-head comparisons. Data cut-off: April 10, 2023 7 6 5 4 3 2
40 References: 1. Leitao et al. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:123-9. 2. CARTAXHY: Lortholary et al. Ann Oncol 2012;23:346-52. 3. Pectasides et al. Gynecol Oncol 2010;118:52-7. 4. Brewer et al. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:446-50. 5. MK-1775-009: Leijen et al. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:4354-61. 6. GYN-49: Moore et al. Clin Cancer Res 2022;28:36-44. 7. SORAYA: Matulonis et al. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:2436-2445. 8. MIRASOL: Immunogen Press Release May 3, 2023. Abbreviations: ORR, objective response rate; mPFS, median progression free survival; m, months. Not direct head-to-head comparisons. The Activity of Azenosertib + Carboplatin is Robust and Durable Compared to Historical Reports of Single Agent Paclitaxel, Adavosertib + Paclitaxel and Mirvetuximab in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer 23 37 39 16 43 30 32 42 36 0 10 20 30 40 50 ORR (%) 4.8 7.1 5.3 4.2 5.5 5.6 10.4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Carboplatin + Weekly Paclitaxel (N=51) Alternating Platinum Doublets (N=45) Adavosertib + Carboplatin (N=21) Adavosertib (5 doses) + Carboplatin (N=23) Mirvetuximab (N=105) Mirvetuximab (N~225) Azenosertib + Carboplatin (N=36) mPFS (m) Objective Response Rate (ORR) Median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) Data cut-off: April 10, 2023 8 7 6 5 3 2
41 Abbreviations: RFS, recurrence free survival, CSS; cancer specific survival, OS; overall survival; PFS, Progression free survival; DMFS; distant metastasis free survival, Patients With Cyclin E1+ Tumors Consistently Have Worse Outcomes On Chemotherapy Hazard Ratio Worse outcome Chappuis PO (2005) [CSS] Desmedt C (2006) [RFS] Jansen MP (2012) [PFS] Luhtala S (2016) [RFS] Lundgren C (2015) [CSS] Lundgren C (2015) [DMFS] Sieuwerts AM (2006) [DMFS] Sieuwerts AM (2006) [OS] Nakayama K (2016) [OS] Nakayama K (2016) [OS] Nakayama K (2016) [PFS] Zhou Z (2014) [OS] Ayahn A (2017) [OS] Chan A MY (2020) [OS] Kang E (2023) [OS] Nakayama N (2010) [OS] Petersen S (2020) [OS] Petersen S (2020) [PFS] Pils D (2014) [OS] Stronach E (2018) [OS] Stronach E (2018) [PFS] Lotan Y (2013) [CSS] Lotan Y (2013) [RFS] Matsushita R (2015) [OS] Shariat SF (2006) [CSS] Shariat SF (2006) [RFS] 1 4 16 Haz ti N 100 500 1000 3000 CCNE1 alteration type Amplification Amplification+Overexpression Overexpression Cancer Type Breast Cancer Endometrial Cancer Esophageal Cancer Ovarian Cancer Urothelial Cancer
42 *Timing of tissue collection was not disclosed. Abbreviations: PFS: progression free survival, OS; overall survival Ovarian Cancer Patients with CCNE1 Amplified and/or Cyclin E1 + Cancers have a Worse Outcome Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Treatment Independent of Platinum- Sensitivity Status Hazard Ratio Cyclin E1 Alteration Worse outcome • 6 Studies; n=5404 • 4 Studies where timing of tissue collection was available-all were platinum sensitive tissue collected after ≤ 1 course of chemotherapy; 3533/5404 (65%) • Other 2 Studies did not disclose timing of tissue collection 1 2 4 53 Chan* (2020) [OS] Nakayama (2010) [OS] Petersen* (2020) [OS] Petersen* (2020) [PFS] Pils (2014) [OS] Stronach (2018) [OS] Stronach (2018) [PFS] N 500 100 1000 Amplification Amplification + Overexpression Kang (2023) [OS] han [ ] Kan [ ] Nakaya a [ ] etersen [ ] t r en ( ) ] Pils [ ] Stronac [ ] Stronach ( ) ] 1 2 3 4 5 Hazard Ratio N 100 500 1000 Cyclin E1 Alteration Amplification Amplification+ Overexpression
43 Zentalis 002: Majority of Ovarian Cancers are Cyclin E1 + IHC H-Score* >150 ≤ 150 to > 50 ≤ 50 CCNE1 Amplified 5 0 0 CCNE1 Not Amplified 25 15 6 Tissue Not Evaluated for Amplification 16 21 6 • H-score > 50 includes all CCNE1 amplified tumors • Prevalence of Cyclin E1-IHC+, H-score > 50 of all safety evaluable patients with tissue is 82/94 (87%); • Prevalence of Cyclin E1+ in the response evaluable patients with tissue is 70/82 (85%). C yc lin E 1 IH C H -S co re * CCNE1 Status Amplified Not amplified Not Evaluated for Amplification 0 Patients 100 200 300 50 150 *H-scores calculated by multiplying the percentage of cells (0 to 100%) with intensity of Cyclin E1 expression (0 to 3); IHC: Im munohistochemistry Safety evaluable: received at least one dose of drug; Response evaluable: have baseline measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, at least one post baseline scan, and received at least one dose of drug Data cut-off: April 10, 2023 250
44 Progression Free Survival is Significantly Improved in Cyclin E1+, Cohort compared to Cyclin E1- Independent of Chemotherapy Backbone *Response evaluable subjects are treated subjects with baseline measurable disease per RECIST version 1.1 and at least one pos t-baseline assessment. Abbreviations: IHC, immunohistochemistry ; CI, confidence interval H-Score ≤ 50 (N=12) H-Score > 50 (N=78) Median PFS (months) 3.25 9.86 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 0.37 (0.18 – 0.79) Log-rank p-value 0.0078 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 5 10 15 20 25 Patients at risk 78 12 36 2 12 1 4 1 1 0 P ro g re ss io n -F re e S u rv iv a l P ro b ab ili ty Time (months) H-Score > 50 H-Score ≤ 50 Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
45 Abbreviations: C, Continuous azenosertib dosing; I, Intermittent azenosertib dosing; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin *All doses were at or below the MTD **A MTD for Gemcitabine + Azenosertib has not been determined, further dose cohorts are ongoing. *** Safety evaluable: received at least one dose of drug Treatment-related Adverse Events: All Doses Moving Forward Involve Intermittent Dosing Treatment-Related Adverse Event ≥20% N (%) Azenosertib + Paclitaxel (Continuous, N=7; Intermittent, N=19) Azenosertib + Carboplatin (Continuous, N=22; Intermittent, N=14) Azenosertib + Carboplatin (Continuous, N=14; Intermittent, N=8) Azenosertib + Gemcitabine (Continuous N=8; Intermittent, N=10) Azenosertib + PLD (Continuous N=27; Intermittent, N=8) Total*** (Continuous, N=64; Intermittent, N=51) All Doses* All Doses Doses ≤ MTD All Doses** All Doses* Grade All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 All Gr Gr ≥3 Hematologic Neutropenia C 5 (71.4) 5 (71.4) 9 (40.9) 7 (31.8) 4 (28.6) 3 (21.4) 7 ( 87.5) 6 (75.0) 19 (70.4) 17 (63.0) 40 (62.5) 35 (54.7) I 11 (57.9) 5 (26.3) 7 (50.0) 1 (7.1) 4 (50.0) - 7 (70.0) 4 (40.0) 3 (37.5) 3 (37.5) 28 (54.9) 13 (25.5) Thrombo- cytopenia C 4 (57.1) 2 (28.6) 16 (72.7) 11 (50.0) 11 (78.6) 6 (42.9) 8 (100.0) 5 (62.5) 9 (33.3) 2 (7.4) 37 (57.8) 20 (31.3) I 4 (21.1) - 9 (64.3) 5 (35.7) 4 (50.0) 2 (25.0) 8 (80.0) 6 (60.0)* 3 (37.5) 3 (37.5) 24 (47.1) 14 (27.5) Anemia C 5 (71.4) - 10 (45.5) 3 (13.6) 5 (35.7) 1 (7.1) 6 (75.0) 2 (25.0) 11 (40.7) 4 (14.8) 32 (50.0) 9 (14.1) I 8 (42.1) 1 (5.3) 10 (71.4) 4 (28.6) 4 (50.0) 1 (12.5) 5 (50.0) 2 (20.0) 2 (25.0) 1 (12.5) 25 (49.0) 8 (15.7) Gastro- intestinal Nausea C 4 (57.1) - 15 (68.2) 1 (4.5) 10 (71.4) 1 (7.1) 5 (62.5) - 16 (59.3) 2 (7.4) 40 (62.5) 3 (4.7) I 7 (36.8) 1 (5.3) 6 (42.9) - 3 (37.5) - 5 (50.0) - 4 (50.0) 1 (12.5) 22 (43.1) 2 (3.9) Vomiting C 3 (42.9) 1 (14.3) 8 (36.4) - 6 (42.9) - 1 (12.5) - 11 (40.7) 2 (7.4) 23 (35.9) 3 (4.7) I 2 (10.5) 1 (5.3) 2 (14.3) - 2 (25.0) - 1 (10.0) - 4 (50.0) 1 (12.5) 9 (17.6) 2 (3.9) Diarrhea C 4 (57.1) 1 (14.3) 4 (18.2) - 1 (7.1) - 1 (12.5) - 8 (29.6) - 17 (26.6) 1 (1.6) I 6 (31.6) 1 (5.3) 5 (35.7) - 3 (37.5) - 6 (60.0) - 2 (25.0) - 19 (37.3) 1 (2.0) Other Fatigue C 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3) 8 (36.4) - 3 (21.4) - 3 (37.5) 1 (12.5) 8 (29.6) 3 (11.1) 25 (39.1) 5 (7.8) I 8 (42.1) 2 (10.5) 5 (35.7) 1 (7.1) 4 (50.0) - 6 (60.0) 2 (20.0) 2 (25.0) - 21 (41.2) 5 (9.8) Data cut-off: April 10, 2023
46 Proposed Randomized Phase 3 Trial Design of Azenosertib + Chemotherapy in Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer that is Cyclin E1+ Key Eligibility: High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer; ECOG performance status 0-1; ≥1L Prior Line of Platinum-based chemotherapy; Platinum-Sensitive (Platinum-free interval ≥ 6 months); Prior Bevacizumab & PARPi if eligible and per regional standard of care; Cyclin E1 + (either CCNE1 amplified and/or Cyclin E1 IHC-Positive) Physician’s Choice Carboplatin-Doublet** (6 cycles) Endpoints Primary Progression-Free Survival by BICR No Maintenance Stratification Factors • Prior lines of therapy (1 v 2-3) • Prior PARPi (Yes v No) • CCNE1 amplification (Yes v No) Azenosertib + Chemotherapy* (6 cycles) Azenosertib*** Maintenance Key Secondary Overall Survival R 2:1 *Paclitaxel or Carboplatin **Paclitaxel or Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ***Azenosertib, 400 mg QD 5:2 Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; 1L, 1 line; PARPi, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor; IHC, immunohistochemistry; BICR, blinded independent central review.
47 *Gemcitabine + Azenosertib has exciting and durable activity-a MTD has not been determined, further dose cohorts are ongoing. Abbreviations: RP2D, recommended phase 2 dose; PLD pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; QD, once daily; 5:2, 5-days of treatment followed by 2-days off treatment; D, day; AUC, area under the curve; mg/mL*min Conclusions: Data Supports Dose and Advancement of Azenosertib- Chemotherapy Combination into Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Main Takeaways • Strong and durable efficacy signal across chemotherapy backbones • Cyclin E1 status predicts benefit of azenosertib addition to chemotherapy • Suggests azenosertib restores chemotherapy sensitivity in heavily pre-treated platinum- resistant ovarian cancer • Plans to initiate Phase 3 study of azenosertib in combination with chemotherapy in Cyclin E1+ platinum sensitive ovarian cancer RP2D Azenosertib Chemotherapy Paclitaxel 300 mg QD 5:2 80 mg/m2 on D1, D8, D15 (28-day cycles) Carboplatin 200 mg QD 5:2 AUC=5 on D1 (21-day cycles) Gemcitabine TBD* TBD* PLD 400 mg QD 5:2 40 mg/m2 D1 (28-day cycles) Data cut-off: April 10, 2023 RP2D established for paclitaxel, carboplatin and PLD combinations
48 Potential to Transform Treatment Paradigm for Patients and Capture Significant Market Share in Ovarian Cancer Cyclin E1+ HRP Cyclin E1+ HRD Cyclin E1 low HRD Others 30% 24% 12% 34% High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patient Segments • Ongoing clinical programs address Cyclin E1+ and HRD+ patient populations • Opportunity is much larger than recently approved therapies • Data support potential role for Azenosertib at every stage of metastatic therapy: • Platinum sensitive: combination with chemotherapy • Platinum resistant: monotherapy and combination with chemotherapy Potential to transform standard of care Azenosertib Monotherapy Potentially Addresses 88% Of High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Sources: 1. HRD prevalence derived from Konstantinopoulos, et al Cancer Discov (2015) 2. CCNE1 amplification prevalence of ~20% reported in Aziz et al Gynecol Oncol (2018) and TGCA Network Nature volume 474 (2011) 3. Cyclin E1 expression and copy number extracted from the digital analysis of Aziz et al Figure 3A to infer full distribution of Cyclin E1 H-scores and overlap with CCNE1 amplification based on Cyclin E1 high definition of H-score >50 4. HRD prevalence and proportion of overlap with CCNE1 amplification from Konstantinopoulos et al, Figure 2 5. Total HGSOC incidence estimates (US, EU5) sourced from SEER and ECIS are 35, 388 individuals/year HRD: Homologous recombination deficient HRP: Homologous recombination proficient
49 Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC Platinum Resistant HRD+ or Cyclin E1+ HGSOC 2L+ USC 2L+ USC 2L+ USC 2L+ USC 2L+ USC 2L Pt. Sensitive, HGSOC 2L Pt. Sensitive, HGSOC 2L Pt. Sensitive, HGSOC 2L Pt. Sensitive, HGSOC 1L+ bRAF CRC 1L+ bRAF CRC 1L+ bRAF CRC HRD+ post-PARPi HRD+ post-PARPi Other Cyclin E+ Tumor Types 38,214 42,077 57,807 77,093 89,027 140,950 P o te n ti al U S + EU 5 P at ie n ts Gynecologic malignancies Non-Gynecologic malignancies Legend Azenosertib monotherpy Azenosertib + chemotherapy Azenosertib + BEACON Indications Over Time Addressable Patient Population More than Doubles as Franchise Expands to Non- Gynecological Malignancies Source: Used ‘drug-treatable’ estimates from DRG Clarivate for all Ovarian, USC, CRC, Breast, Prostate and Pancreatic. For ‘Other Cyclin-E1 driven solid tumors’ used incidence reported by SEER and ECIS. Cyclin E1 prevalence in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer derived from Petersen, et al CCNE1 and BRD4 co-amplification in high-grade serous ovarian cancer is associated with poor clinical outcomes, Gynecologic Oncology,Volume 157, Issue 2, 2020 Abbreviations: bRAF+ CRC: bRAF mutant Colorectal Cancer; HRD+ : Homologous Recombinant Repair Deficiency; HGSOC: High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer; 2L: Secon d Line HRD+ Post PARPi tumor types: Prostate, Pancreas and Breast; Other Cyclin E+ Tumor Types include bladder, stomach, esophageal, lung squamous, lung adenocarcinoma, and breast cancer
50 Today’s Conclusions: Great Progress in Advancing Azenosertib’s Potential to Transform Cancer Care Solid efficacy with multiple chemotherapy combinations • Significant improvements in ORR and mPFS over chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy + adavosertib • Opportunity to use Cyclin E+ as biomarker to identify patients who would benefit from azenosertib addition to chemo Abbreviations: RP2D, recommended Phase 2 dose; ORR, confirmed objective response rate; HGSOC, High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer; USC, Uterine Serous Carcinoma of the Endometrium; 2H23, second half of 2023; mPFS, media progression free survival Comprehensive Clinical Strategy • All lines of therapy for ovarian cancer, both as a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy • Post-pembro (≥2 L) therapy for USC • Clinical trial timelines to be updated in 2H23 Azenosertib monotherapy RP2D dose: 400 mg intermittent (5 days on, 2 days off a week; 5:2) • Increased exposures with intermittent dosing led to an ORR of 36.8% in Ovarian Cancer and USC • Strong safety profile: no treatment-related discontinuations • Majority of patients remain on therapy; update in 2H23
51 Our Thanks And Deepest Appreciation To All Patients, Caregivers, Families, And Investigators KBC Bežanijska kosa A hospital you can trust.
Question & Answer Session 52 Kimberly Blackwell, MD Chief Executive Officer Zentalis Pharmaceuticals Carrie Brownstein, MD Chief Medical Officer Zentalis Pharmaceuticals Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD Chair of the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics -- the Phase 1 Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Member, Zentalis Scientific. Advisory Board
Backup: Data Breakdown for ASCO Disclosures N, ORR (%) Azenosertib + Paclitaxel Azenosertib + Carboplatin Azenosertib + Gemcitabine Azenosertib + PLD Total Efficacy Evaluable in Abstract* 9/18 (50.0) 9/27 (33.3) 2/14 (14.3) 5/35 (14.3) 25/94 (26.6) Efficacy Evaluable ASCO Poster Data Cut** 11/26 (42.3) 10/29 (34.5) 5/18 (27.8) 6/35 (17.1) 32/104 (30.8) Response Evaluable on ASCO Poster** 11/22 (50.0) 10/28 (35.7) 5/13 (38.5) 6/31 (19.4) 32/94 (34.0) Definitions: • Efficacy evaluable: received at least 1 dose of study drug, measurable disease at baseline • Response evaluable: received at least one dose of study drug, measurable disease at baseline AND at least one follow-up scan *Data Cut Off of January 17, 2023 **Data Cut Off of April 10, 2023 Reasons for 21 patients not being evaluable: No post-baseline scan yet (n=11); AE (n=4); Subject decision (n=4); Withdrawal of consent (n=1); Clinical progression (n=1)